InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

Lueck and Wilson (2010)

 The following two studies may be used to answer a question on acculturation or assimilation. Both studies look at protective factors that play a role in helping immigrants to acculturate to US culture, but they look at different populations and use different research methods.

Background information

Acculturative stress refers to the stressors associated with being an immigrant or ethnic minority and going through the acculturation process. Berry discussed four different types of acculturation.  In separation, immigrants keep their original culture and do not adopt the new culture. In marginalization, immigrants do not identify with either their original culture or their new culture.  In assimilation, immigrants gradually lose all of the markers of their original culture and fully adopt the new culture.  Finally, in integration, an immigrant becomes bicultural - identifying with and being fully functional in both cultures.

Researchers are interested in the variables that may affect the successful assimilation or integration of an individual into a new culture.  Factors that decrease acculturative stress are called protective factors.  On the other hand, risk factors are variables that increase acculturative stress and may prevent successful assimilation or integration.

In a study carried out by Miranda and Matheny (2000), the researchers wanted to see which factors in the lives of Latino immigrants to the United States would decrease the level of acculturative stress. A random sample of 197 members of two social services agencies completed a questionnaire as well as standardized tests to assess family cohesion, level of acculturation, acculturative stress, and coping strategies for stress.

The study suggested that immigrants with effective coping strategies, good proficiency in English, and a strong family structure were less likely to experience acculturative stress. In addition, immigrants who had spent a longer time in the US were less like to demonstrate this stress and show a higher level of acculturation. 

However, not all cultures have the same characteristics.  The study below looked at whether protective and risk factors were similar for Asian immigrants to the USA.

Procedure and results

The aim of this study was to investigate the variables that may predict acculturative stress in a nationally representative sample of Asian immigrants and Asian Americans. The sample consisted of 2095 Asian Americans.  1271 of the participants were first-generation immigrants who were 18 years and older when they came to the US.  The rest of the sample was born in the US to first-generation immigrant parents. The sample consisted of several different Asian cultures, including Chinese, Filipino, and Vietnamese.

The researchers carried out semi-structured interviews.  The interviewers had cultural and linguistic backgrounds similar to those of the sample population. Interviews were conducted either over the Internet or face-to-face.  A randomly selected sample of participants was contacted to validate the data taken from their interviews.

The interviews measured the participants’ level of acculturative stress.  They also measured the impact of language proficiency, language preference, discrimination, social networks, family cohesion, and socioeconomic status on acculturative stress.

In 1433 of the 2095 interviews, participants were found to have acculturative stress according to their acculturative stress score – that is, 70% of the sample.  

The study drew the following conclusions:

  1. A bilingual language preference contributed to lower acculturative stress. Asians who are able to use both languages equally with their friends are able to build up networks of support within and outside their community. Stress may arise when Asian Americans do not know the native language well enough to discuss sensitive issues with family members at home or in the native country who may have limited or no abilities in English
  2. Although bilingualism is a predictor of low acculturative stress, the preference for speaking English only is a predictor of high acculturative stress.
  3. Negative treatment – including prejudice, xenophobia, harassment, and threats - significantly contributed to higher acculturative stress.
  4. Sharing similar values and beliefs as a family significantly contributed to lowering acculturative stress
  5. Acculturative stress was significantly lower among those who were very satisfied with their economic opportunities in the US and also among immigrants who, if they would have to make the decision again, would still move to the United States.

Evaluation

The researchers carried out semi-structured interviews. The strength is that these are more personal than a questionnaire.  In addition, they allow the researcher to ask follow-up questions when they get an interesting or unclear response; this avoids the problem where an individual did not understand the question or wrote something ambiguous/undeveloped.  The limitation is that carrying out large numbers of interviews is time-consuming and costly.  It is also necessary to train interviewers.  Finally, interviews are also open to interviewer effects - where characteristics of the interviewer may lead the interviewee to disclose less (or more) information.

In both studies, the constructs of acculturative stress and level of acculturation are relatively subjective.  In addition, measuring the extent to which one shares values with one's family assumes that the values of Asian culture are the same for all families. Economic satisfaction is subjective, so it is not a problem that it is self-reported.  However, it is difficult to say that a reported level of economic satisfaction by one person is equivalent to that same level of reported satisfaction by another person.

The study used a very large sample for an interview study. The sample is representative in the sense that it is diverse: 600 Chinese, 508 Filipino, 520 Vietnamese, and 467 other Asians.  The sample suffers from the same problem as the use of a "Latino" sample in the study by Miranda and Matheny - there are certain assumptions made about "Asians" which could result in the "ecological fallacy" - for example, assumptions that the cultures are collectivistic without actually measuring each individual's level of collectivism.