Study guide: Social responsibility
- /
- Student resources/
- Human relationships/
- Revision (review): Relationships/
- Study guide: Social responsibility
In order to prepare for exams, it is important to prepare a "tailor-made" study guide. A study guide should reflect your own learning and not just what someone tells you is the "best" research to use on an exam.
For the topic "Social responsibility," you will find an attached study guide. I recommend that you attempt to fill it in before looking at the responses below. There is both a paper and a digital copy available.
Social responsibility study guide
Digital Social responsibility study guide
Terms/theories: Diffusion of responsibility, Arousal Cost Reward Model, Social Exchange Theory, Negative State Relief Theory, Social Identity Theory
Research: Darley & Batson (1973), Pilivian et al (1969), Latané and Darley's studies - e.g. the cubicles where another student was having a seizure; the smoke-filled room
Critical thinking: the issues with studies of altruism, operationalization of variables, ecological validity, conflicting results in the field and in the lab.
Different command terms: Evaluate research
text
Terms/theories: Altruism, inclusive fitness, kin selection, Empathy Altruism model, Social Exchange Theory, Negative State Relief Theory, etic vs emic
Research: Marsh et al (2014), Bartal, Decety and Mason (2011) on prosocial behaviour in rats, Kin Selection Theory; Toi and Batson (1982), Cialdini on Negative State Relief; Social Exchange Theory; Levine (2001) on the role of environment and culture on helping; Whiting and Whiting on the role of collectivistic culture; Levine (2005) on in-group bias.
Critical thinking: etic vs emic approaches to studying helping behaviour; ecological validity, difficulties in measurement of variables and the problems with debriefings.
Different command terms: Evaluate research.
text
Terms/theories: social learning
Research: Positive: Beaman et al (1978); Staub (1979); Feshbach and Feschbach (1982); Banyard (2005); Sprafin et al (1975); Greitemeyer and Osswald (2010); Lim and DeStefano (2016). Negative: Ferguson et al (2007); Jeong and Lee (2013); Decety et al (2013); Simons et al (2002)
Critical thinking: the need for data triangulation; retrospective vs prospective research; the difficulties in establishing cause and effect relationships; assumptions that are made; the limitations of using questionnaires and surveys to gather data; role of researcher and publication bias.
Different command terms: Evaluate, contrast, to what extent
text
Terms/theories: Altruism, Kin Selection Theory, Inclusive Fitness
Research: Marsh et al (2014), Bartal, Decety and Mason (2011) on prosocial behaviour in rats, Kin Selection Theory
Critical thinking: Limitations of using anecdotal evidence, use of animal models to understand human behaviour, difficulties in explaining mechanisms, difficult to test the theories.
Different command terms: Evaluate, Contrast biological and another approach
text
Terms/theories: Negative State Relief, Social Exchange Theory, Empathy-Altruism Model
Research:Toi and Batson (1982), Cialdini on Negative State Relief; Latané and Darley's lab experiments, Pilivian et al (1969)
Critical thinking: Difficulties of measuring "negative state" or "empathy', reliance on self-reported data; ecological validity of the studies; the difference between what we see in the field, and what we see in the lab.
Different command terms: Evaluate, Contrast cognitive and another approach
text
Terms/theories: etic and emic; cultural dimensions, Social Identity Theory
Research: Levine (2001) on the role of environment and culture on helping; Whiting and Whiting on the role of collectivistic culture; Levine (2005) on in-group bias, Darley & Batson (1973), Greitemeyer and Osswald (2010);
Critical thinking: The limitations of using an etic approach; the difficulty of controlling extraneous variables in sociocultural research; difficulties of establishing cause and effect relationships; theories are more descriptive than predictive.
Different command terms: Evaluate, Contrast sociocultural and another approach
text
Terms/theories: research methods = interviews, observations, experiments, correlational studies, and case studies.
Research: Any research could be used. For example, Experiments: Darley & Batson (1973); Toi and Batson (1982); Pilivian et al (1969); Observational study: Bartal et al on helping in rats; Correlational studies: Decety et al (2013); Simons et al (2002); Lim and DeStefano (2016).
Critical thinking: Limitations of research methods. Problems of operationalization. The ability to draw conclusions about cause and effect.
Different command terms: Evaluate, contrast
text
Terms/theories: Ethical considerations include: informed consent, anonymity, right to withdraw, deception, undue stress or harm, and debriefing.
Research: Any research could be used to discuss ethical considerations.
Critical thinking: Issues of informed consent with minors (Piliavin et al); issues of deception (Latane and Darley's cubicle study; Latane and Batson's Good Samaritan study); undue stress and harm (Piliavin, Latane and Batson).
Different command terms: This can only be asked as a "discuss" question.
text