InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

Study guide: Obesity

In order to prepare for exams, it is important to prepare a "tailor-made" study guide.  A study guide should reflect your own learning and not just what someone tells you is the "best" research to use on an exam.

For the topic "health problems: obesity", you will find an attached study guide.  I recommend that you attempt to fill it in before looking at the responses below.  There is both a paper and a digital copy available.

Health problems: Obesity study guide

Digital Health problems: Obesity study guide

Question 1: Discuss one or more biological explanations of one health problem.

Terms/theories: Ghrelin, leptin, feedback loop, BMI,

Research: Hormones: Gladstone (2010), Friedman (1995); Genetics: Sorensen (1992), Dutch Hunger Winter Study, Farooqui and O'Rahilly (2006), Stunkard (1990)

Critical thinking: dependence on animal models, ethical considerations, the interaction between genes and environment, reductionist approaches, applications (e.g. leptin resistance drugs), areas of uncertainty, problems with using BMI.

Different command terms: Evaluate, contast with another approach, to what extent

Question 2: Discuss one or more cognitive explanations of one health problem.

Terms/theories: Dual Processing Model, illusory correlation, cognitive load, mediating factor

Research: Song and Schwarz (2007, 2009) on illusory correlation; Pascoe and Richman (2011) and Shiv and Fedorikhin (1999) on cognitive load; Wansick's self-filling soup bowl (2005) and Wansick (2007) on contextual cues. Crum's milkshake study on the role of labeling on ghrelin levels.

    Critical thinking: studies have high internal validity but often are highly artificial and lack ecological validity; the use of cross-sectional vs. longitudinal designs; applications of the research (restaurant sales; health campaigns); inability to accurately observe cognitive processes; inability to isolate extraneous variables under naturalistic conditions; although studies indicate decision-making patterns, they do not demonstrate a direct causal relationship with obesity.

    Different command terms: Evaluate, contrast with another approach, to what extent

    Question 3: Discuss one or more sociocultural explanations of one health problem.

    Terms/theories: sedentary, BMI

    Research: Availability of fast food: Currie (2010); Joseph (2015); sedentary lifestyle: Martinez Gonzalez (1999); Vendelanotte (2009); stress:  Koch (2008), Schiveley and Day (2015) in macaques; availability of public transportation: She, King and Jacobson (2017); Østbye (2013) on social learning from parents.

    Critical thinking: a more holistic approach to obesity; inability to establish a cause and effect relationship; reliant on self-reported data; use of animal models; issues of construct validity - sedentary, BMI, fast food.

    Different command terms: Evaluate, contrast with another approach, to what extent

    Question 4: Discuss prevalence rates of one health problem.

    Terms/theories: prevalence, incidence,

    Research: Fast food: Currie et al (2010); Joseph et al (2015); Effectiveness of programmes: Youlian et al (2016);  sedentary lifestyle: Martinez Gonzalez (1999); Vendelanotte (2009); stress:  Koch (2008), Schiveley and Day (2015) in macaques; availability of public transportation: She, King and Jacobson (2017).

    Critical thinking: how prevalence is calculated; reliability of self-reported data and clinical diagnoses; use of prevalence rates to show the effectiveness of health programs; factors that affect prevalence rates. Even if the prevalence of a health problem increases or decreases as a result of a societal or environmental change, it is not possible to establish a cause and effect relationship. Comparing prevalence rates over time is problematic because there are so many variables that could account for any difference.

    Different command terms: This can only be asked as a "discuss" question.

    Question 5: Discuss one or more research methods used in the study of health problems.

    Terms/theories: research methods = interviews, observations, experiments, correlational studies, and case studies.

    Research: Any research could be used. For example, Experiments: Wansick's self-filling soup bowl (2005) or Crum's milkshake study; case study: Youlian et al (2016); Structured interviews: Martinez Gonzales (1999)

    Critical thinking: Limitations of research methods.  Problems of operationalization.  The ability to draw conclusions about cause and effect.

    Different command terms: Evaluate, contrast

    Question 6: Discuss ethical considerations in the study of health problems.

    Terms/theories: Ethical considerations include: informed consent, anonymity, right to withdraw, deception, undue stress or harm, and debriefing.

    Research: Any research could be used to discuss ethical considerations.

    Critical thinking: Issues of informed consent with minors (Joseph et al); issues of deception (Crum's milkshake study); undue stress and harm (stigmatization, feelings of embarrassment when assigned to the "obese" condition); importance of debriefing (Østbye when discussing the role of moms in childhood obesity).

    Different command terms: This can only be asked as a "discuss" question.