InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

ERQ marking: Bio methods

Below you will find three sample ERQs for the question: Evaluate two research methods used in the study of the brain and behaviour in the biological approach.

For each of the samples, refer to the rubric to award marks. After each sample, there is a predicted grade as well as feedback on the strengths and limitations of the sample.

ERQ rubric

 

Sample 1

The biological approach investigates the biological explanations of human behaviour. This considers genetics, the development of the brain, and how the brain governs human behaviour. A large variety of research methods can be employed in order to learn more about genetics and the brain; however, I will be focusing on and evaluating the use of case studies as well as the use of quasi-experiments.

Case studies play an important role in the biological approach. Two famous studies are the studies of HM and EP. The former of the two is one of the main reasons why we know as much as we do about memory today. HM was in a car accident at the age of 7 and sustained a head injury that resulted in epileptic seizures. At the age of 27, he underwent an experimental surgery that included the removal of the hippocampus.  After the surgery HM developed retrograde amnesia, meaning he would not be able to retain any memory past a span of a few minutes to a few seconds.  Milner carried out a case study that involved method triangulation in order to understand more about the lasting effects of HM’s surgery.  This case study drew conclusions such as the hippocampus plays a significant role in converting short-term memory to long-term memory, and that different types of memory such as procedural and emotional memory are stored in different parts of the brain. By using case studies of atypical subjects we can understand the brain's anatomy and physiological functions in new ways. Case studies allow us to study situations we could never create in a laboratory. Case studies, unfortunately, have limitations as well. The case study by nature is the study of one rare case, therefore making it less reliable, and it is unlikely generalizable. We cannot recreate the study of HM because we cannot ethically recreate his situation.

One research method that is not commonly used within the scope of the biological approach is the quasi-experiment or natural experiment. A quasi-experiment does not randomly allocate participants to conditions and investigates the influence of a naturally occurring independent variable on the participants. An example of a quasi-experiment would be Maguire’s experiment on taxi drivers. The experiment was to observe whether there was an anatomical difference between the brains of London taxi drivers and an average person. The study was a single-blind study in order to control for researcher bias. The study showed that the posterior hippocampi of the taxi drivers were much larger than of those who were not taxi drivers due to extensive training and experience. The size of the hippocampus had a significant positive correlation with time spent as a taxi driver. This relates to the concept of neuroplasticity. However, the non-random allocation to a condition means that the results cannot be considered valid and the study cannot be reliably replicated. A quasi-experiment contains too many random confounding variables.

The biological approach favours more controlled research methods that can find biological explanations for why humans behave the way they do. Quasi-experiments are a less controlled and less precise research method. This is the opposite of case studies, which are generally very controlled and can lead to revolutionary research through the study of unique cases. However, these two research methods in combination can yield very productive results.

551 words

Focus on the question: The essay is not well focused on the question.  There is a lack of focus on evaluation - that is, a discussion of the strengths and limitations of the research methods.  1 mark.

Knowledge and understanding: Neither the case study method nor quasi-experiments are clearly explained. The studies are not described in terms of the methods used, lacking clear knowledge and understanding of how the methods are used. There are several ambiguous uses of psychological terminology. 2 marks

Use of research: The HM study is not described in any detail, except to say that it used "method triangulation." The Maguire study is also not described in any clear detail.  2 marks.

Critical thinking: Although critical thinking is attempted, it is neither correct nor developed.  1 mark.

Clarity and organization: The essay is organized. Explanations and attempts at critical thinking are not clearly communicated. 1 mark

Total: 7 marks

Predicted: 3

Sample 2

The biological approach argues that human behaviour has physiological origins and that ‘biology’ should be taken into account when studying human beings. Psychologists use multiple research methods to investigate how environmental factors interact with biological systems in both animals and humans. Two research methods that are used in this approach are laboratory experiments and case studies.

The purpose of using laboratory experiments in the biological approach is for the researchers to establish a causal relationship between two variables - the independent and the dependent variable. Experiments are based on hypothesis testing - that is, making a measurable and testable hypothesis and then seeing if the results of the study are statistically significant so that they can reject the null hypothesis. In addition, an experiment must contain at least one group that receives a treatment (the manipulation of an independent variable), and a control group does not receive the treatment. In a true experiment, participants are randomly allocated to conditions.

Rogers & Kesner conducted a laboratory experiment with the aim to determine the role of a neurotransmitter acetylcholine in spatial memory formation; there are multiple acetylcholine receptors in the hippocampus that play a role in the consolidation of memory. Firstly, the researchers had mice run a simple maze to find food that was placed in one of the two corners. After having run the maze, but before memory could be consolidated, the mice were injected with one of two chemicals into their hippocampal region. The first group was injected with scopolamine, which blocks the acetylcholine receptors and thus inhibits the response. The second group was a control one, given a placebo injection of saline solution to make sure that getting an injection does not cause any change in memory. Thereafter, the two groups were placed again into the maze to see how long it would take them to find the food they had previously located. The results show that the scopolamine group took longer and made more mistakes in finding the food, whereas the control group learned faster and made fewer mistakes. All in all, the findings indicate that the neurotransmitter acetylcholine may play an important role in the consolidation of spatial memory and retrieval.

One of the most significant strengths of a laboratory experiment is that it has a highly standardized procedure so the study can be replicated by other researchers, and the reliability of the results can be further tested. Experiments also try to control extraneous variables and randomly allocate participants to conditions, which increases the internal validity, allowing for a cause and effect relationship to be established. On the other hand, they suffer from low ecological validity due to the highly controlled environments, meaning that the results may not reflect behaviour under normal conditions. It is also not always clear to what extent the results of animal research may be applicable to human beings such as from rats to humans in the Rogers & Kesner study.

Another research method in the biological approach is a case study. Case studies are comprehensive investigations of one individual with a particular brain abnormality or damage; case studies provide situations that cannot be ethically reproduced by researchers in a laboratory under controlled conditions. They are also often carried out longitudinally to observe short-term and long-term effects, where the same variables are investigated in repeated and different types of observations over long periods of time. An independent variable is not manipulated in this type of research and hence, no causal relationship can be established. In addition, psychologists study the brain-damaged patient by using triangulation - for example, more than one method, researcher, and different sources of data

Milner carried out a classic case study on HM on the role of the hippocampus in memory formation; HM sustained a serious head injury when he fell off his bicycle at the age of 7, and beginning from three years after his accident, suffered from repeating epileptic seizures. With the approval of HM and his family, tissue from the medial temporal lobe, including the hippocampus, was removed in an experimental surgery on both sides of his brain. Although HM remembered his childhood very well and his personality seemed relatively unchanged after the surgery, he had suffered from anterograde amnesia—not being able to transfer new information from short-term memory to long-term memory. Milner longitudinally studied HM through different methods such as psychometric testing, direct observations, interviews, MRI scans, and cognitive testing. The researchers have found that HM could not acquire new episodic memories [memories of autobiographical events] and semantic knowledge [general world knowledge], however, procedural memories were not impacted; they have concluded that hippocampal region plays a significant role in memory formation.

One of the strengths of case studies is that they collect rich data. Case studies collect data over a long period of time, accounting for both short-term and long-term effects on the patient’s behaviour; they also use a more holistic approach as opposed to experiments by looking at a range of behaviours, rather than measuring a single dependent variable. In addition, the use of method triangulation increases the validity of the results.  Nevertheless, generalizability is one of the most critical limitations of this type of research method; case studies often study brain abnormality or damage that is unique to an individual and for that reason, the observed results cannot be generalized to the behaviour of all human beings. In addition, a causal relationship cannot be established as an independent variable is not manipulated in this type of research. Lastly, it might also be difficult for the researcher to acquire and verify information about the patient prior to his/her accident, which may otherwise be of some use when drawing conclusions.

While laboratory experiments may be helpful for researchers to determine cause and effect relationships that can be tested for reliability through replication by other researchers, case studies may provide more unique and in-depth research into individual human behaviour that could not be otherwise ethically reproduced. All in all, despite some of the methods' weaknesses, psychologists generally attempt to use them together to investigate human beings in terms of the roots of physical processes and physiological origins.

1022 words

Focus on the question: The essay is clearly focused on the demands of the question.  2 marks.

Knowledge and understanding: The response demonstrates a very good understanding of the two research methods.  Both methods are clearly explained with minor errors or lack of clarity. 5 marks.

Use of research: The studies are both appropriate and described in terms of the research method. 6 marks

Critical thinking: The methods are clearly evaluated. Both strengths and limitations of the methods are clearly discussed.  6 marks

Clarity and organization: The response is well-organized and language communicates effectively. 2 marks.

Total: 21 marks

Predicted: 7

Sample 3

The biological approach in psychology tries to explain behaviour through biology. In order to see how different factors like neurotransmitters, hormones, or genetics have an effect on behaviour, psychologists use different research methods to come to conclusions. Two research methods that are used in the biological approach are case studies and experiments.

Case studies are a type of method that concentrates on studying a specific individual with a certain trait. This is done because by investigating the personal lives of the individuals, one may try to understand and help the average person who also has the same illness. In the following case, method triangulation is used to test and explain behaviour through different approaches. A holistic approach is used as one takes the certain patient’s lifestyle, health, and the environment into consideration. Case studies are an effective way of showing how different factors in a person’s life are connected to each other. Through method triangulation, different psychometric testing such as IQ testing is conducted, interviews, as well as direct observations of the patient, are taken, and cognitive testing such as memory recall tests.

A famous study conducted by Milner was the case of HM, where he was studying the role of the hippocampus in memory formation. HM suffered a serious head injury after being hit with a bicycle at a very young age which led to epileptic attacks and seizures. With his and his family’s approval, his medial temporal lobe, and therefore hippocampus, were removed from both sides of his brain. It was important to find out what the effects of the surgery had on HM.

His working memory, such as having a conversation, and procedural memory was still intact. However, the results showed that HM could not obtain any new episodic knowledge, that is memory of events; nor could he obtain semantic knowledge, which is general knowledge of the world around him. This showed that the part of the brain that was most damaged was the hippocampus region of the brain, which is responsible for transferring STM to LTM.

A strength of this study is that it was longitudinal, meaning that HM was observed over a very long period of time and as the case study uses triangulation, we can rely on the data, as it was taken through many different approaches. A limitation is that it is very hard to replicate; however, other patients that had similar conditions to HM were studied and confirm the findings. However, in general, case studies study individuals who are not representative of the general population. 

Case studies have high ecological validity as no variables are manipulated. HM lived in his natural environment and wasn’t studied in a lab. Case studies also collect both qualitative and quantitative data. This makes for rich data.

Another method used in the biological approach is an experiment which is one of the methods that is very commonly used to study behaviour. Experiments are conducted to determine whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Experiments are based on a hypothesis that predicts the relationship between the dependent and independent variables, and a control group that is used as a comparison to the condition with the manipulated independent variable.

An experiment conducted by Newcomer et al (1999) studied the effects of stress on verbal declarative memory. Newcomer used the stress hormone cortisol to determine whether taking high levels of the pill would interfere with verbal declarative memory. As experiments are also standardized, the procedure can be replicated so that the reliability of the findings can be tested.

This experiment was a double-blind study, meaning that neither the participants nor the researcher knew which of the three following conditions would be assigned to certain participants. Double-blind studies are a good way of preventing researcher bias. It also means that the participant doesn’t know whether they would get a placebo pill or not. The participants were also matched for age and gender to have an even distribution of participants among the 3 conditions.

Participants in the first condition, high level of cortisol, took a tablet of 160mg of cortisol each day for four consecutive days. Participants in the second condition, low level of cortisol, took a tablet of 40mg of cortisol for the same number of days. Condition 3 participants were the placebo group, who received a pill with no cortisol. After taking the pill the participants were asked to listen to a prose passage and then asked to recall it, to measure their verbal declarative memory.

Findings were that low levels of cortisol improved the verbal declarative performance of the participants; however, a high dosage of cortisol impaired the performance. The placebo pill had the most positive effect on verbal declarative memory.

A limitation of the study may be that the prose passage might not have been a natural way of measuring verbal declarative memory. This might depend on the culture because some cultures memorize poems and stories from a young age, so that might have an effect on the results of the study. However, since the study was done using employees or students of a university in the US, it is highly possible that many of the participants were raised in the US as well where it’s not that common to memorize poems.  A strength of this experiment is that Newcomer was able to clearly show the cause and effect relationship between the two variables. A limitation, however, was that the participants were not studied at all times, as they came into the lab only for the actual memory test. An ethical consideration in this study is that the participants, although they signed a consent form, were given pills that may have had some short-term damage to their brains.

953 words

Focus on the question: The essay is generally focused on the question; toward the end of the essay the response loses focus on the evaluation of research methods. 1 mark.

Knowledge and understanding: Generally good understanding of the research methods. Some ideas are not clearly expressed or developed. 5 marks.

Use of research: The studies are appropriate and fairly well described in terms of the method.  HM could be described a bit more carefully.  Newcomer is an appropriate study in that it is assumed that cortisol is interacting with the hippocampus, but the response does not actually make that link  Without the explicit link, no credit is awarded for this second piece of research. 3 marks.

Critical thinking: There is evident critical thinking, but in the second half of the essay it focuses more on the studies than on the research method. 4 marks.

Clarity and organization: The response is logically organized and the language is generally clear.  2 marks.

Total: 15 marks

Predicted: 5