InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

Quasi experiment: Food mind-set

The following is a sample Paper 3 that looks at a quasi-experiment. Below you will first find the stimulus piece, followed by the static questions.  A copy of the mock paper is included to give students as an in-class assessment.

Potential answers are included in the hidden boxes below.

Student copy

Link to the original study

The stimulus piece

One of the cognitive theories of obesity is that people who are overweight or obese are more likely to notice and be distracted by food.  This is known as an attentional bias. To test the role of attentional bias for food in overweight and obese people, Kaisari (2018) carried out a quasi-experiment.

The sample was made up of 43 overweight or obese participants and 49 healthy-weight participants. Participants were between 18 - 60 years old. The sample was a self-selected sample, recruited through posters, emails and mass mailings. To reduce demand characteristics, participants were told that it was a study of eating habits and memory. Any participants who had a history of an eating disorder were excluded from the study.

The two groups (overweight vs. not overweight) were exposed to two different conditions. They were either given a "food mindset" in which they were asked to memorize pictures of food items, or a "non-food mindset", where they were asked to memorize images that were not food related - such as a hammer. Then, they were asked to sit at a computer terminal and locate a circle as quickly as they could, while ignoring a distractor (a square). On some trials, the circle was accompanied by a food image; in other trials, the distractor was accompanied by the food image.

All participants found it harder to spot the circle when they were in a food mindset and it was the distractor, rather than the target circle, that was accompanied by an image of food. Crucially, however, the distracting effect of food and being in a food mindset was greater for the overweight or obese participants, suggesting they had a harder time disengaging from food. 

The participants also returned to the lab a year later for a weigh-in. The more that the participants’ task performance had been swayed by a food mindset, the greater their increase in BMI tended to be, indicating that the attentional processes uncovered in the lab have a real-life impact. The researchers argue that thinking about food increases the likelihood of overeating because a person is more responsive to the presence of food in the environment.

References

Kaisari, P., Kumar, S., Hattersley, J., Dourish, C. T., Rotshtein, P., & Higgs, S. (2018). Top-down guidance of attention to food cues is enhanced in individuals with overweight/obesity and predicts change in weight at one-year follow up. International Journal of Obesity. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0246-3

Questions

1a. Identify the method used and outline two characteristics of the method.

1b. Describe the sampling method used in the study.

1c. Suggest an alternative or additional research method giving one reason for your choice.

2. Describe the ethical considerations that were applied in the study and explain if further ethical considerations could be applied.

3. Discuss how a researcher could ensure that the results of the study are credible.