Date | May 2010 | Marks available | 7 | Reference code | 10M.3dm.hl.TZ0.5 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 3 Discrete mathematics | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Show that | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Given that \(a,{\text{ }}b,{\text{ }}c,{\text{ }}d \in \mathbb{Z}\), show that
\[(a - b)(a - c)(a - d)(b - c)(b - d)(c - d) \equiv 0(\bmod 3).\]
Markscheme
EITHER
we work modulo 3 throughout
the values of a, b, c, d can only be 0, 1, 2 R2
since there are 4 variables but only 3 possible values, at least 2 of the variables must be equal \((\bmod 3)\) R2
therefore at least 1 of the differences must be \(0(\bmod 3)\) R2
the product is therefore \(0(\bmod 3)\) R1AG
OR
we attempt to find values for the differences which do not give \(0(\bmod 3)\) for the product
we work modulo 3 throughout
we note first that none of the differences can be zero R1
a − b can therefore only be 1 or 2 R1
suppose it is 1, then b − c can only be 1
since if it is 2, \((a - b) + (b - c) \equiv 3 \equiv 0(\bmod 3)\) R1
c − d cannot now be 1 because if it is
\((a - b) + (b - c) + (c - d) = a - d \equiv 3 \equiv 0(\bmod 3)\) R1
c − d cannot now be 2 because if it is
\((b - c) + (c - d) = b - d \equiv 3 \equiv 0(\bmod 3)\) R1
we cannot therefore find values of c and d to give the required result R1
a similar argument holds if we suppose a − b is 2, in which case b − c must be 2 and we cannot find a value of c − d R1
the product is therefore \(0(\bmod 3)\) AG
[7 marks]
Examiners report
Most candidates who solved this question used the argument that there are four variables which can take only one of three different values modulo 3 so that at least two must be equivalent modulo 3 which leads to the required result. This apparently simple result, however, requires a fair amount of insight and few candidates managed it.