Date | May 2019 | Marks available | 12 | Reference code | 19M.2.SL.TZ0.4 |
Level | SL | Paper | 2 (model questions) | Time zone | no time zone |
Command term | To what extent | Question number | 4 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
RESOURCE BOOKLET: Implanted microchips
Source A: Graphic
Source B: Series of message posts
Posts from award-winning tech influencer and blogger @richtech
Source C: Article – Bans on microchipping employees
Many countries are passing laws that prohibit companies from requiring employees to have a device such as microchip or radio frequency identification device (RFID) tag implanted into their bodies as a condition of employment.
Employees can still be microchipped if they volunteer to do so. Tech4All, a technology company, has microchipped more than 50 of its employees. The company claims the microchips help people to open building doors, access their computers, and pay for items in the company restaurant.
It takes 40–60 days for the chip to settle under the skin. During this period, it can itch, and scratching is discouraged as it could dislodge the chip. The chips are relatively durable and will handle most bumps, but extreme pressure has been known to shatter them. The chips do not heat up or explode when anywhere near airport security scanners, but they may fail after a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
Source D
Biohacking is the next stage in human evolution. Biohackers can optimize their bodies with a combination of gadgets, microchip implants, diets, or anything else they can put into their body to make it work better. The use of microchip implants is also an extension of the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT). By 2030, it is estimated that there will be more than 75 billion connected devices.
Microchips have been used in pets as form of identification to quickly reunite owners with lost or injured pets. Now, microchipping is being considered for the tracking of individuals like the elderly, those with memory loss, and prisoners.
Supporters of microchip implants say they are safe and can be protected from being hacked. However, there are privacy concerns about the data transmitted from or stored on the microchip. These concerns go beyond those associated with location tracking.
To what extent do you agree that the advantages of implanting microchips in humans outweigh the concerns? Use all the sources and your own knowledge.
Markscheme
Answers may include:
Advantages:
Can enhance daily life:
- Easy access to unlock doors/locations (Source, A, B), pay for food (Source A).
- Examples beyond sources may include:
- data on RFID could be matched to health data: allergies, medicines, vaccines (values and ethics)
- can be scanned if unconscious/unable to communicate (systems).
Used for identification:
- No need to carry ID, can't lose your ID (Source B) (systems).
- Can authenticate an employee’s identity (all sources), including pets, people.
- Examples beyond sources may include:
- preventing mix-ups, such as with newborn babies
- improvement in work performance.
Theft prevention:
- I&A highly reliable (Source C) (systems).
- No need to memorize passwords.
- Examples beyond sources may include:
- swipe cards/keys can be lost or stolen.
Safe to use
- Pets are already microchipped and this is socially accepted (Source D) (values and ethics).
- Health/biosafety concerns (Source C).
Concerns:
Legal:
- Laws need to be written to accept the implants (Source C) (power).
- Laws prohibit enforcing mandating the use of microchip (power).
- What policies do organizations need to implement this practice (values and ethics)?
Health:
- Health/biosafety concerns (Source C), such as chips may shatter, chips may dislodge (systems).
- Examples beyond sources may include:
- uncertainty of long-term health impacts
- bodily migration – could move around the body
- mental health/psychological issues resulting from concerns from implants.
Privacy:
- Privacy/anonymity concerns need to be addressed (Source D).
- Who owns the data on the chip (power)?
- Who has access to the data and how (power)?
- Is the chip a form of surveillance (values and ethics)?
- Who is accountable if a data leak occurs?
Security:
- Can the chips be hacked (Source D)? What security is in place to stop unauthorized access to data and manipulation of data (systems)?
- Do the chips communicate, somehow, with outside networks / are they secure (systems)?
Implementation and reliability:
- Cost – both the implants and the infrastructure/RFID readers.
- Compatibility/interoperability issues due to lack of universal standards; new technologies for access may not be compatible.
- Hardware replacement: will new features require new hardware that is not easy to replace?
- How are chips updated when flaws are found?
Social acceptance:
- Low social acceptance (Source D).
- Examples beyond sources may include:
- religious objections to implants/do religious beliefs forbid the practice (values and ethics)?
- are incentives provided to those that participate (values and ethics)?
- digital divide: will non-participants be disadvantaged?
- will implants be truly voluntary in the future (values and ethics)?
Keywords: health, business, employment, health, laws, policies, regulations, implanted technologies, privacy, anonymity, surveillance, monitoring, compatibility, interoperability, wearable devices, security, authentication, accountability, reliability, acceptance, change, identity, power, systems, values and ethics
Refer to SL/HL paper 2 question 4 markbands when awarding marks. These can be found under the "Your tests" tab > supplemental materials > Digital society markbands and guidance document.