Date | November 2021 | Marks available | 12 | Reference code | 21N.1.HL.TZ0.5 |
Level | HL | Paper | 1 | Time zone | no time zone |
Command term | Evaluate | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Smart farming
A government in East Africa is using the expertise of scientists at a university in the region to promote the culture of smart farming and increase the productivity of farmers (see Figure 5). To do this, they have developed an app that the farmers can use to assist them in their decision-making.
Figure 5: An example of farming in East Africa
[Palmer, N., 2010. A farmer at work in Kenya’s Mount Kenya region [image] [online] Available at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2DU_Kenya_86_(5367322642).jpg (CC BY-SA 2.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en [Accessed 18 May 2020].]
Unfortunately, the scientists who developed the app have received many complaints from farmers who have been unable to use it. They are considering two options:
- making the existing system more user-friendly
- educating the farmers to use the existing system.
The scientists claim by making changes to the app it will make the app more user-friendly for the farmers. However, the farmers claim it would be better to provide them with education, such as training, so they can use the existing app.
Evaluate these two claims.
Markscheme
Answers may include:
Intervention 1: Making the system more user-friendly (claim)
Advantages of making the system more user-friendly:
- May only require minimal adjustments to the interface (feasibility / systems).
- Can probably be done in the short term, so will have a more immediate impact.
- Will require little or no training of farmers, so cheaper than providing training, which may involve the development of online training sites (systems) or require farmers to travel to a college (cost, feasibility).
- May require less testing before the improved interface is introduced (systems, cost).
Disadvantages of making the system more user-friendly:
- Famers may use it as it is fit for purpose and may not use all of the functionality that the app provides (acceptability).
- The redesign of the digital system may not be any improvement on the current one (innovation, technological determinism, feasibility).
- The redesign of the digital system may not be cost-effective.
Intervention 2: Educating the farmers to use the existing system (counter-claim)
Advantages of educating the farmers to use the existing system:
- Will provide a longer-term solution that will be beneficial over a longer period of time.
- May provide other benefits, as farmers become more tech savvy and are able to use other apps developed by this university or other universities (acceptability).
Disadvantages of educating the farmers to use the existing system:
- May give farmers a greater ownership of the initiative/innovation (values).
- Farmers may not be able to spare the time to carry out the training/may not want to carry out the training/be appreciative of a functional app (values).
In this question it is expected there will be a balance between the terminology related to digital systems and the terminology related to social and ethical impacts.
Keywords: agriculture, training, education, innovation, costs, apps, networks, change, power, systems, values, ethics, feasibility
Refer to HL paper 1 Section B markbands when awarding marks. These can be found under the "Your tests" tab > supplemental materials > Digital society markbands and guidance document.