Date | May 2019 | Marks available | 6 | Reference code | 19M.2.SL.TZ0.3 |
Level | SL | Paper | 2 (model questions) | Time zone | no time zone |
Command term | Compare and contrast | Question number | 3 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
RESOURCE BOOKLET: Implanted microchips
Source A: Graphic
Source B: Series of message posts
Posts from award-winning tech influencer and blogger @richtech
Source C: Article – Bans on microchipping employees
Many countries are passing laws that prohibit companies from requiring employees to have a device such as microchip or radio frequency identification device (RFID) tag implanted into their bodies as a condition of employment.
Employees can still be microchipped if they volunteer to do so. Tech4All, a technology company, has microchipped more than 50 of its employees. The company claims the microchips help people to open building doors, access their computers, and pay for items in the company restaurant.
It takes 40–60 days for the chip to settle under the skin. During this period, it can itch, and scratching is discouraged as it could dislodge the chip. The chips are relatively durable and will handle most bumps, but extreme pressure has been known to shatter them. The chips do not heat up or explode when anywhere near airport security scanners, but they may fail after a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
Source D
Biohacking is the next stage in human evolution. Biohackers can optimize their bodies with a combination of gadgets, microchip implants, diets, or anything else they can put into their body to make it work better. The use of microchip implants is also an extension of the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT). By 2030, it is estimated that there will be more than 75 billion connected devices.
Microchips have been used in pets as form of identification to quickly reunite owners with lost or injured pets. Now, microchipping is being considered for the tracking of individuals like the elderly, those with memory loss, and prisoners.
Supporters of microchip implants say they are safe and can be protected from being hacked. However, there are privacy concerns about the data transmitted from or stored on the microchip. These concerns go beyond those associated with location tracking.
Compare and contrast what Source C and Source D reveal about the implanting of microchips in humans.
Markscheme
Answers may include:
Physical safety/health:
- Source C warns users of the risks of the microchip implant, such as shattering due to force, whereas Source D acknowledges the safety of the microchip implants that have been used for years in pets.
Data privacy:
- Source D introduces the concept of tracking through RFID implants, whereas in Source C, RFID is used for I&A and some employees have concerns about how data is being used, so an assumption would be made that data is collected at points where employees authenticate/identify themselves in locations at work.
- Both sources raise privacy concerns about the use of the data; Source C focuses on the personal data of employees, whereas Source D highlights privacy concerns of personal data being hacked and/or being mined for economic gain (profiling and consumer analysis).
Benefits of use/ease of access:
- Source C provides examples of the ease of use to open doors and access computers. Likewise, Source D provides examples of tracking pets and potentially people in the future.
Legal issues:
- Source C emphasizes the rights of the employees and protects them from mandatory implants, whereas Source D views it as the next step since it is already being used in pets.
Acceptance:
- Source D notes that acceptance rates are low, with 66% of those polled saying they would not be chipped, whereas Source C notes that over 75% of employees have been chipped. This suggests that people may change their opinion/acceptance when offered the opportunity.
- Both sources suggest that the use of microchip implants may increase in the future. Source C notes that, despite the introduction of laws, employees can have implants voluntarily; likewise, Source D suggests that implants are being considered for future use.
Identification:
- Both sources state that RFID can be used to establish identity. Source C provides examples that extend to authentication, whereas Source D limits this to identification only, such as pets, the elderly, people with memory loss, and criminals.
Concerns:
- Both sources outline concerns with the technology. Source C notes employee concerns about how the data is used, pressure to be chipped, and countries introducing laws about usage; Source D notes concerns about privacy and the idea of an implant being disturbing. This suggests that there are a range of issues surrounding the use of this technology that need to be resolved before it is socially accepted.