Date | November 2016 | Marks available | 3 | Reference code | 16N.3dm.hl.TZ0.2 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 3 Discrete mathematics | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Explain | Question number | 2 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
In this question no graphs are required to be drawn. Use the handshaking lemma and other results about graphs to explain why,
a graph cannot exist with a degree sequence of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9;
a simple, connected, planar graph cannot exist with a degree sequence of 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5;
a tree cannot exist with a degree sequence of 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3.
Markscheme
assume such a graph exists
by the handshaking lemma the sum of the degrees equals twice the number of edges R1
but 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45 which is odd R1
this is a contradiction so graph does not exist AG
[2 marks]
assume such a graph exists
since the graph is simple and connected (and v=6>2) then e⩽3v−6 R1
by the handshaking lemma 4+4+4+4+5+5=2e so e=13 A1
hence 13⩽3×6−6=12 A1
this is a contradiction so graph does not exist AG
[3 marks]
assume such a graph exists
a tree with 6 vertices must have 5 edges (since V−E+1=2 for a tree) R1
using the Handshaking Lemma 1+1+2+2+3+3=2×5 implies 12=10 M1A1
this is a contradiction so graph does not exist AG
[3 marks]