Date | November 2019 | Marks available | 1 | Reference code | 19N.3.AHL.TZ0.Hsp_1 |
Level | Additional Higher Level | Paper | Paper 3 | Time zone | Time zone 0 |
Command term | State | Question number | Hsp_1 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Peter, the Principal of a college, believes that there is an association between the score in a Mathematics test, , and the time taken to run 500 m, seconds, of his students. The following paired data are collected.
It can be assumed that follow a bivariate normal distribution with product moment correlation coefficient .
State suitable hypotheses and to test Peter’s claim, using a two-tailed test.
Carry out a suitable test at the 5 % significance level. With reference to the -value, state your conclusion in the context of Peter’s claim.
Peter uses the regression line of on as and calculates that a student with a Mathematics test score of 73 will have a running time of 101 seconds. Comment on the validity of his calculation.
Markscheme
A1
Note: It must be .
[1 mark]
A2
Note: Accept anything that rounds to 0.65
0.649 > 0.05 R1
hence, we accept and conclude that Peter’s claim is wrong A1
Note: The A mark depends on the R mark and the answer must be given in context. Follow through the -value in part (b).
[4 marks]
a statement along along the lines of ‘(we have accepted that) the two variables are independent’ or ‘the two variables are weakly correlated’ R1
a statement along the lines of ‘the use of the regression line is invalid’ or ‘it would give an inaccurate result’ R1
Note: Award the second R1 only if the first R1 is awarded.
Note: FT the conclusion in(a)(ii). If a candidate concludes that the claim is correct, mark as follows: (as we have accepted H1) the 2 variables are dependent and 73 lies in the range of values R1, hence the use of the regression line is valid R1.
[2 marks]