Date | May 2010 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 10M.1.sl.TZ1.9 |
Level | SL only | Paper | 1 | Time zone | TZ1 |
Command term | Explain | Question number | 9 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Let f(x)=cosxsinx , for sinx≠0 .
In the following table, f′(π2)=p and f″ . The table also gives approximate values of f'(x) and f''(x) near x = \frac{\pi }{2} .
Use the quotient rule to show that f'(x) = \frac{{ - 1}}{{{{\sin }^2}x}} .
Find f''(x) .
Find the value of p and of q.
Use information from the table to explain why there is a point of inflexion on the graph of f where x = \frac{\pi }{2} .
Markscheme
\frac{{\rm{d}}}{{{\rm{d}}x}}\sin x = \cos x , \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{{\rm{d}}x}}\cos x = - \sin x (seen anywhere) (A1)(A1)
evidence of using the quotient rule M1
correct substitution A1
e.g. \frac{{\sin x( - \sin x) - \cos x(\cos x)}}{{{{\sin }^2}x}} , \frac{{ - {{\sin }^2}x - {{\cos }^2}x}}{{{{\sin }^2}x}}
f'(x) = \frac{{ - ({{\sin }^2}x + {{\cos }^2}x)}}{{{{\sin }^2}x}} A1
f'(x) = \frac{{ - 1}}{{{{\sin }^2}x}} AG N0
[5 marks]
METHOD 1
appropriate approach (M1)
e.g. f'(x) = - {(\sin x)^{ - 2}}
f''(x) = 2({\sin ^{ - 3}}x)(\cos x) \left( { = \frac{{2\cos x}}{{{{\sin }^3}x}}} \right) A1A1 N3
Note: Award A1 for 2{\sin ^{ - 3}}x , A1 for \cos x .
METHOD 2
derivative of {\sin ^2}x = 2\sin x\cos x (seen anywhere) A1
evidence of choosing quotient rule (M1)
e.g. u = - 1 , v = {\sin ^2}x , f'' = \frac{{{{\sin }^2}x \times 0 - ( - 1)2\sin x\cos x}}{{{{({{\sin }^2}x)}^2}}}
f''(x) = \frac{{2\sin x\cos x}}{{{{({{\sin }^2}x)}^2}}} \left( { = \frac{{2\cos x}}{{{{\sin }^3}x}}} \right) A1 N3
[3 marks]
evidence of substituting \frac{\pi }{2} M1
e.g. \frac{{ - 1}}{{{{\sin }^2}\frac{\pi }{2}}} , \frac{{2\cos \frac{\pi }{2}}}{{{{\sin }^3}\frac{\pi }{2}}}
p = - 1 , q = 0 A1A1 N1N1
[3 marks]
second derivative is zero, second derivative changes sign R1R1 N2
[2 marks]
Examiners report
Many candidates comfortably applied the quotient rule, although some did not completely show that the Pythagorean identity achieves the numerator of the answer given. Whether changing to - {(\sin x)^{ - 2}} , or applying the quotient rule a second time, most candidates neglected the chain rule in finding the second derivative.
Whether changing to - {(\sin x)^{ - 2}} , or applying the quotient rule a second time, most candidates neglected the chain rule in finding the second derivative.
Those who knew the trigonometric ratios at \frac{\pi }{2}typically found the values of p and of q, sometimes in follow-through from an incorrect f''(x) .
Few candidates gave two reasons from the table that supported the existence of a point of inflexion. Most stated that the second derivative is zero and neglected to consider the sign change to the left and right of q. Some discussed a change of concavity, but without supporting this statement by referencing the change of sign in f''(x) , so no marks were earned.