Date | May 2022 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 22M.2.hl.TZ2.5 |
Level | HL | Paper | 2 | Time zone | TZ2 |
Command term | Explain | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Iron(II) disulfide, FeS2, has been mistaken for gold.
State the full electronic configuration of Fe2+.
Explain why there is a large increase from the 8th to the 9th ionization energy of iron.
Calculate the oxidation state of sulfur in iron(II) disulfide, FeS2.
Describe the bonding in iron, Fe (s).
Markscheme
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6 ✔
Any two of:
IE9: electron in lower energy level
OR
IE9: more stable/full electron level ✔
IE9: electron closer to nucleus
OR
IE9: electron more tightly held by nucleus ✔
IE9: less shielding by «complete» inner levels ✔
–1 ✔
Accept “– I”.
electrostatic attraction/hold between «lattice of» positive ions/cations AND delocalized «valence» electrons ✔
Examiners report
Mostly well done which was a pleasant surprise since this is not overly easy, predictably some gave [Ar] 4s2 3d4.
Despite some confusion regarding which sub-level the electrons were being removed from, many candidates were able to make at least one valid point, commonly in terms of lower energy/ full sub level/closer to nucleus.
This was an easy question, yet 30% of the candidates were unable to work it out; some wrote the oxidation state in the conventionally incorrect format, 1- and lost the mark.
Most candidates knew the bonding in Fe is metallic but some did not “describe” it or missed the type of attraction, a minor mistake; others referred to nuclei or protons instead of cations/positive ions. In some cases, candidates referred too ionic bonding, probably still thinking of FeS2 (not reading the question well). Overall, only 30% answered satisfactorily.