User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2008 Marks available 2 Reference code 08M.1.sl.TZ2.1
Level SL only Paper 1 Time zone TZ2
Command term Write in symbolic form Question number 1 Adapted from N/A

Question

(i)     Complete the truth table below.

(ii)    State whether the compound propositions \(\neg (p \wedge q)\) and \(\neg p \vee \neg q\) are equivalent.

[4]
a.

Consider the following propositions.

\(p:{\text{ Amy eats sweets}}\)

\(q:{\text{ Amy goes swimming.}}\)

Write, in symbolic form, the following proposition.

Amy either eats sweets or goes swimming, but not both.

[2]
b.

Markscheme

(i)

     (A3)

Note: Award (A1) for \(p \wedge q\) column correct, (A1)(ft) for \(\neg (p \wedge q)\) column correct, (A1) for last column correct.

 

(ii)    Yes.     (R1)(ft)     (C4)

Note: (ft) from their second and the last columns. Must be correct from their table.

[4 marks]

a.

\(p {\underline \vee} q\).     (A1)(A1)     (C2)

Note: Award (A1) for \(p \ldots q\), (A1) for \({\underline \vee} \). Accept \((p \vee q) \wedge \neg (p \wedge q)\) or \((p \vee q) \wedge (\neg p \vee \neg q)\).

[2 marks]

b.

Examiners report

This question was well answered by many of the candidates. It is an area of the syllabus that is well taught and many managed to get a follow through mark even though one of the columns in the table might have been incorrect.

a.

This question was well answered by many of the candidates. It is an area of the syllabus that is well taught and many managed to get a follow through mark even though one of the columns in the table might have been incorrect.

b.

Syllabus sections

Topic 3 - Logic, sets and probability » 3.2 » Compound statements: implication, \( \Rightarrow \) ; equivalence, \( \Leftrightarrow \) ; negation, \(\neg \) ; conjunction, \( \wedge \) ; disjunction, \( \vee \) ; exclusive disjunction, \(\underline \vee \) .
Show 32 related questions

View options