Date | May 2016 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 16M.1.sl.TZ1.5 |
Level | SL only | Paper | 1 | Time zone | TZ1 |
Command term | Write down | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Consider the following statements
z:xz:x is an integer
q:xq:x is a rational number
r:xr:x is a real number.
i) Write down, in words, ¬q¬q.
ii) Write down a value for xx such that the statement ¬q¬q is true.
Write the following argument in symbolic form:
“If xx is a real number and xx is not a rational number, then xx is not an integer”.
Phoebe states that the argument in part (b) can be shown to be valid, without the need of a truth table.
Justify Phoebe’s statement.
Markscheme
i) xx is not a rational number (A1)
Note: Accept “xx is an irrational number”.
ii) any non-rational number (for example: π,√2π,√2, …) (A1) (C2)
(r∧¬q)⇒¬z(r∧¬q)⇒¬z (A1)(A1)(A1) (C3)
Note: Award (A1) for “⇒⇒” seen, (A1) for “¬z¬z” as the consequent and (A1) for “(r∧¬q)(r∧¬q)” or “(¬q∧r)(¬q∧r)” as the antecedent (the parentheses are required).
all integers are rational numbers (and therefore xx cannot be an integer if it is not a rational number) (R1)
Note: Accept equivalent expressions.
OR
if xx is an integer, then xx is a rational number, therefore if xx is not a rational number, then xx is not an integer (contrapositive) (R1) (C1)
Note: Accept “If xx is not in Q, then x is not in Z” with a Venn diagram showing R, Q and Z correctly.
Examiners report
Question 5 Logic
In part (a), the majority of candidates were able to state the negation, but surprisingly many were unable to give an example of a non-rational number.
In part (b), a common error was the lack of parentheses in the antecedent. A further error was the use of the “intersection” symbol rather than that for conjunction; care must be taken in this regard.
Part (c) proved problematic for all but the best candidates.