Date | May 2017 | Marks available | 22 | Reference code | 17M.Paper 1.BP.TZ1.5 |
Level | SL and HL | Paper | Paper 1 | Time zone | TZ1 |
Command term | Discuss | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Discuss how social and/or cultural factors affect one cognitive process.
Markscheme
Refer to the paper 1 section B assessment criteria when awarding marks.
The command term “discuss” requires candidates to offer a considered review of how social and/or cultural factors affect one cognitive process. As the concepts of social and cultural factors are arguably very much related, a distinction between the two is not necessary.
Candidates should give a considered review of the way in which social and/or cultural factors affect how people process information, for example, memory, thinking, perception, attention, decision-making or language.
Examples of appropriate factors include, but are not limited to:
- the effect of cultural norms and past experience on memory (Bartlett, 1932)
- the effect of social identity on formation of flashbulb memories (Luminet and Curci, 2009)
- the effect of schooling on encoding strategies (Cole and Scribner, 1974)
- the effect of cultural upbringing on memories of self (Wang, 2006)
- the effect of poverty on cognitive processing, in particular free recall tasks (Mani, 2013; Pollitt, 1995)
- the role of environmental factors on perception (Deregowski, 1972; Segall et al.’s carpentered world hypothesis, 1966).
Discussion of the cultural and/or social factors may include, but is not limited to:
- Methodological considerations
- Empirical support and contrary findings
- Application of empirical findings.
If a candidate discusses more than one cognitive process, credit should be given only to the first discussion.
If a candidate discusses only one social and/or cultural factor, the response should be awarded up to a maximum of [5] for criterion A and a maximum of [2] for criterion C.
Candidates may discuss a small number of factors in order to demonstrate depth of knowledge, or may discuss a larger number of factors in order to demonstrate breadth of knowledge. Both approaches are equally acceptable.