User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2021 Marks available 8 Reference code 21M.2.HL.TZ0.1
Level Higher level Paper Paper 2 Time zone Time zone 0
Command term Evaluate Question number 1 Adapted from N/A

Question

Filipino rice farmers prepare for trade liberalization

  1. To meet its obligations under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, the president of the Philippines has asked the government to eliminate the current quota system for rice imports. As an important part of food security measures, the government wants to achieve self-sufficiency in the production of rice. To support this goal, the WTO allowed the Philippines to extend its rice quota until June 2017 to allow more time for local farmers to prepare for free trade.

  2. The current quota system for rice imports makes domestic prices rise dramatically during periods of low domestic supply.

  3. Eliminating the quota on rice aims to make the rice market more competitive, which could reduce the price of rice by as much as 7 Philippine pesos (PH₱) per kilogram (kg). The National Economic and Development Authority has estimated that lower rice prices could save Filipino households as much as PH₱2362 per year. However, if the rice quota is eliminated, economists have warned that the government must prepare local rice producers so that they can either compete with rice imports or move to producing other crops. “Currently Filipino farmers cannot compete with Vietnamese farmers who may enjoy economies of scale” declared one economist. “The solution is to bring down the cost of production of rice.”

  4. To help Filipino farmers to adjust to competition from lower-priced rice imports, the government has allocated funds to the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund. This fund will provide support to farmers in order to increase productivity by supplying high-yield seeds and fertilizer. It will also provide subsidies to encourage the use of agricultural machinery and will offer support services and training to farmers.

  5. Apart from being an essential food for many Filipinos, rice is also an important input for the food industry. The plan to remove the import quota will reduce the inflation rate in the Philippines by up to 0.4 %. In July 2018, the central bank governor reported that inflation had reached 5.7 %, well above the government’s target range of 2 % to 4 %. He stated that “supply-side factors are the main drivers of the present inflation. These factors include rising international oil prices, higher indirect taxes and poor weather conditions that have affected food supply”. The president stated that the removal of the rice quota was one solution to ease the rising inflation.

Table 1: Average economic costs and prices of rice in the Philippines and Vietnam

[Source: Rappler, 2018. Gov’t to support farmers amid moves to lift rice import quotas. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/business/203837-government-support-philippine-farmers-lifting-rice-import-quotas [accessed 1 June 2018]. Source adapted.

Philippine News Agency, 2018. Tariff on imported rice to rake in P20-B yearly. Available at: http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1043516 [accessed 2 August 2018]. Source adapted.

Ernesto M. Ordoñez / Inquirer.net, 2018. Averting the 35% rice tariff crisis. Available at: https://business.inquirer.net/258373/averting-35-rice-tariff-crisis#ixzz5VJ32ugph.

Ben O. de Vera, Inquirer.net, 2018. Tariff on rice to curb inflation by 0.4 percentage point. Available at: https://business.inquirer.net/256313/tariff-rice-curb-inflation-0-4-percentage-point#ixzz5VGfm0xUp [accessed 29 August 2018]. Source adapted.]

State two functions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) (paragraph [1]).

[2]
a.i.

Define the term free trade indicated in bold in the text (paragraph [1]).

[2]
a.ii.

Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how removing “the import quota will reduce the inflation rate in the Philippines” (paragraph [5]).

[4]
b.

Using a perfect competition diagram, explain whether farmers in the Philippines are making an economic profit or loss (Table 1).

[4]
c.

Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the impact on the economy in the Philippines of removing the rice quota.

[8]
d.

Markscheme

a.i.

a.ii.

Candidates who incorrectly label diagrams can be awarded a maximum of [3].

For AD/AS the vertical axis may be average (general) price level, APL or price level. For the horizontal axis, real output, real national output, real income, real national income, real GDP or real Y. Any abbreviations are acceptable. A title is not necessary.

b.

Candidates who incorrectly label diagrams can be awarded a maximum of [3].

NB Candidates must state the values in either the diagram or the explanation for full marks.

NB Some candidates may refer to the Vietnamese price of PH₱9.64 shown in Table 1. This is also acceptable as it must be assumed that these candidates consider that, once the quota is removed, the price in the Philippines will fall to the Vietnamese level. Both PH₱12.19 and PH₱9.64 should be accepted as valid prices.

For a perfectly competitive diagram, the vertical axis may be labelled Cost (C), Price (P) or Revenue (R). The horizontal axis may be labelled Quantity (Q) or Output. A title is not necessary. AC or ATC can be used.

NB MC curve is not required for full marks.

 

c.

Examiners should be aware that candidates may take a different approach which, if appropriate, should be rewarded.

Do not award beyond Level 2 if the answer does not contain reference to the information provided.

“Evaluate” requires candidates to make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations.

Economic Analysis may include:

Positive impacts may include

Negative impacts may include:

Any reasonable evaluation.

d.

Examiners report

Overall not well answered. Too many students confused the WTO with other organizations such as the IMF or World Bank. Some candidates tended to highlight the aims of the WTO rather than its functions.  

a.i.

On what should be a straightforward definition, a surprising number of answers lacked precision, e.g. "Free trade is trade without restrictions". Candidates should be reminded that definitions need to be precise and that vague answers will attract 1 mark at best.

a.ii.

While the question specifically asked for an an AD/AS diagram, a significant minority of students offered up a quota diagram. 

Two different approaches (decrease of AS or decrease in AD) were offered by candidates with a variety of reasons for each shift.

Some lower-achieving responses lost one mark for not relating the decrease in AS with the increase in the cost of production. Good responses had little difficulty in explaining, using the diagram, that removing the import quota would likely increase the supply of rice, reducing its price thus lowering input costs, a significant component in calculating the CPI/inflation rate.

Some candidates took the alternative route and explained the impact on inflation in terms of an increase in the value of imports resulting from the removal of the quota on rice and how this would decrease X-M, resulting in a fall in AD with a consequent impact on inflation.

b.

This was generally well answered. Overall there was evidence of a sound understanding of the perfect competition model and a testament to good teaching of this element of the syllabus. Some potentially good answers were marred by a failure to use the data provided either on the diagram or in the explanation. This inevitably resulted in a loss of 1 mark. Some constructed a perfect competition diagram but failed to indicate a loss.

c.

As with most part (d) questions, there was a general lack of depth of analysis and effective evaluation with a disappointing number of students managing to achieve a Level 3 quality of answer. The higher­-achieving answers focused on the macroeconomic impact of the removal of the quota, i.e. impact on inflation, employment (focusing on specific sectors) and economic growth. Some students highlighted the impact on the balance of payments. Lower-achieving responses spent too much time explaining the effect of a quota rather than the impact of its removal. Such an approach attracted few marks and wasted valuable time that would have been better spent on the more salient aspects of the question. Candidates should be encouraged to only focus on the question being asked rather than the one they would like to have been asked. In addition, little effective use was made of the information in the extract, with too many students simply repeating the points made in the text without much analysis or evaluation.

d.

Syllabus sections

Last exams 2021 » Section 3: International economics » 3.1 International trade » Restrictions on free trade: Trade protection » Types of trade protection
Show 30 related questions
Last exams 2021 » Section 3: International economics » 3.1 International trade » Restrictions on free trade: Trade protection
First exams 2022 » Unit 4: The global economy » 4.2 Types of trade protection » 4.2.2 Quota
Last exams 2021 » Section 3: International economics » 3.1 International trade
First exams 2022 » Unit 4: The global economy » 4.2 Types of trade protection
Last exams 2021 » Section 3: International economics
First exams 2022 » Unit 4: The global economy
First exams 2022
Last exams 2021

View options