User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2017 Marks available 2 Reference code 17N.3.sl.TZ0.14
Level SL Paper 3 Time zone TZ0
Command term Suggest Question number 14 Adapted from N/A

Question

In the 20th Century, both fission and fusion were considered as sources of energy but fusion was economically and technically unattainable.

Compare and contrast fission and fusion in terms of binding energy and the types of nuclei involved.

[2]
a.i.

Suggest two advantages that fusion has over fission.

[2]
a.ii.

The amount of 228Ac in a sample decreases to one eighth ( 1 8 ) of its original value in about 18 hours due to β-decay. Estimate the half-life of 228Ac.

[1]
b.

Markscheme

Fission: heavy nuclei AND Fusion: light nuclei

both increase in binding energy/energy yield «per nucleon»

Accept “large nuclei” OR “greater atomic masses of nuclei” for fission AND “small nuclei” OR “smaller atomic masses of nuclei” for fusion.

Award [1 max] for “Fission: heavy nuclei AND increase in binding energy «per nucleon»” OR “Fusion: light nuclei AND increase in binding energy” «per nucleon»”.

a.i.

Any two of:

no/less radioactive waste produced

abundance/low cost of fuel

larger amounts of energy released per unit mass

does not require a critical mass

can be used continuously

fusion reactor less likely to cause large-scale technological disaster

Do not accept "no/less waste produced".

Accept “higher specific energy”.

[Max 2 Marks]

a.ii.

6 «hours»

b.

Examiners report

[N/A]
a.i.
[N/A]
a.ii.
[N/A]
b.

Syllabus sections

Options » C: Energy » C.3 Nuclear fusion and fission
Show 52 related questions
Options » C: Energy
Options

View options