Date | May 2015 | Marks available | 5 | Reference code | 15M.3sp.hl.TZ0.5 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 3 Statistics and probability | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Prove that | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Determine the probability generating function for \(X \sim {\text{B}}(1,{\text{ }}p)\).
Explain why the probability generating function for \({\text{B}}(n,{\text{ }}p)\) is a polynomial of degree \(n\).
Two independent random variables \({X_1}\) and \({X_2}\) are such that \({X_1} \sim {\text{B}}(1,{\text{ }}{p_1})\) and \({X_2} \sim {\text{B}}(1,{\text{ }}{p_2})\). Prove that if \({X_1} + {X_2}\) has a binomial distribution then \({p_1} = {p_2}\).
Markscheme
\({\text{P}}(X = 0) = 1 - p( = q);{\text{ P}}(X = 1) = p\) (M1)(A1)
\({{\text{G}}_x}(t) = \sum\limits_r {{\text{P}}(X = r){t^r}\;\;\;} \)(or writing out term by term) M1
\( = q + pt\) A1
[4 marks]
METHOD 1
\(PGF\) for \(B(n,{\text{ }}p)\) is \({(q + pt)^n}\) R1
which is a polynomial of degree \(n\) R1
METHOD 2
in \(n\) independent trials, it is not possible to obtain more than \(n\) successes (or equivalent, eg, \({\text{P}}(X > n) = 0\)) R1
so \({a_r} = 0\) for \(r > n\) R1
[2 marks]
let \(Y = {X_1} + {X_2}\)
\({G_Y}(t) = ({q_1} + {p_1}t)({q_2} + {p_2}t)\) A1
\({G_Y}(t)\) has degree two, so if \(Y\) is binomial then
\(Y \sim {\text{B}}(2,{\text{ }}p)\) for some \(p\) R1
\({(q + pt)^2} = ({q_1} + {p_1}t)({q_2} + {p_2}t)\) A1
Note: The \(LHS\) could be seen as \({q^2} + 2pqt + {p^2}{t^2}\).
METHOD 1
by considering the roots of both sides, \(\frac{{{q_1}}}{{{p_1}}} = \frac{{{q_2}}}{{{p_2}}}\) M1
\(\frac{{1 - {p_1}}}{{{p_1}}} = \frac{{1 - {p_2}}}{{{p_2}}}\) A1
so \({p_1} = {p_2}\) AG
METHOD 2
equating coefficients,
\({p_1}{p_2} = {p^2},{\text{ }}{q_1}{q_2} = {q^2}{\text{ or }}(1 - {p_1})(1 - {p_2}) = {(1 - p)^2}\) M1
expanding,
\({p_1} + {p_2} = 2p\) so \({p_1},{\text{ }}{p_2}\) are the roots of \({x^2} - 2px + {p^2} = 0\) A1
so \({p_1} = {p_2}\) AG
[5 marks]
Total [11 marks]
Examiners report
Solutions to (a) were often disappointing with some candidates simply writing down the answer. A common error was to forget the possibility of \(X\) being zero so that \(G(t) = pt\) was often seen.
Explanations in (b) were often poor, again indicating a lack of ability to give a verbal explanation.
Very few complete solutions to (c) were seen with few candidates even reaching the result that \(({q_1} + {p_1}t)({q_2} + {p_2}t)\) must equal \({(q + pt)^2}\) for some \(p\).