Date | May 2016 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 16M.2.hl.TZ0.6 |
Level | HL only | Paper | 2 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Show that | Question number | 6 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Consider the set J={a+b√2:a, b∈Z} under the binary operation multiplication.
Consider a+b√2∈G, where gcd(a, b)=1,
Show that J is closed.
State the identity in J.
Show that
(i) 1−√2 has an inverse in J;
(ii) 2+4√2 has no inverse in J.
Show that the subset, G, of elements of J which have inverses, forms a group of infinite order.
(i) Find the inverse of a+b√2.
(ii) Hence show that a2−2b2 divides exactly into a and b.
(iii) Deduce that a2−2b2=±1.
Markscheme
(a+b√2)×(c+d√2)=ac+bc√2+ad√2+2bd M1
=ac+2bd+(bc+ad)√2∈J A1
hence J is closed AG
Note: Award M0A0 if the general element is squared.
[2 marks]
the identity is 1(a=1, b=0) A1
[1 mark]
(i) (1−√2)×a=1
a=11−√2 M1
=1+√2(1−√2)(1+√2)=1+√2−1=−1−√2 A1
hence 1−√2 has an inverse in J AG
(ii) (2+4√2)×a=1
a=12+4√2 M1
=2−4√2(2−4√2)(2+4√2)=2−4√2−28 A1
which does not belong to J R1
hence 2+4√2 has no inverse in J AG
[5 marks]
multiplication is associative A1
let g1 and g2 belong to G, then g−11, g−12 and g−12g−11 belong to J M1
then (g1g2)×(g−12g−11)=1×1=1 A1
so g1g2 has inverse g−12g−11 in J⇒G is closed A1
G contains the identity A1
G possesses inverses A1
G contains all integral powers of 1−√2 A1
hence G is an infinite group AG
[7 marks]
(i) (a+b√2)−1=1a+b√2=1a+b√2×a−b√2a−b√2 M1
=aa2−2b2−ba2−2b2√2 A1
(ii) above number belongs to J and a2−2b2∈Z R1
implies a2−2b2 divides exactly into a and b AG
(iii) since gcd(a, b)=1 R1
a2−2b2=±1 AG
[4 marks]
Examiners report
Parts (a), (b) and (c) were generally well done. In a few cases, squaring a general element was thought, erroneously, to be sufficient to prove closure in part (a).
Parts (a), (b) and (c) were generally well done. In a few cases, squaring a general element was thought, erroneously, to be sufficient to prove closure in part (a).
Parts (a), (b) and (c) were generally well done. In a few cases, squaring a general element was thought, erroneously, to be sufficient to prove closure in part (a).
In part (d) closure was rarely established satisfactorily.
Part (e) was often tackled well.