Date | November 2011 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 11N.1.sl.TZ0.8 |
Level | SL only | Paper | 1 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Calculate | Question number | 8 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
In this question give all answers correct to 2 decimal places.
George travelled from the USA to Europe and changed 12001200 dollars (USD) into Euros (EUR). The exchange rate was 1 USD=0.8154 EUR1 USD=0.8154 EUR.
Calculate the number of EUR George received.
On his return, George had 160160 EUR to change back into USD. There was 4.5%4.5% commission charged on the exchange. The exchange rate was 11 USD = 0.82020.8202 EUR.
Calculate the value, in EUR, of the commission that George paid.
On his return, George had 160160 EUR to change back into USD. There was 4.5%4.5% commission charged on the exchange. The exchange rate was 11 USD = 0.82020.8202 EUR.
Calculate the number of dollars George received.
Markscheme
The first time the answer is not given to 2 decimal places the final (A1) in that part is not awarded, incorrect rounding, following correct method, can be ignored in subsequent parts.
\(1200 \times 0.8154\) (M1)
=978.48 EUR=978.48 EUR (A1) (C2)
[2 marks]
The first time the answer is not given to 2 decimal places the final (A1) in that part is not awarded, incorrect rounding, following correct method, can be ignored in subsequent parts.
160×0.045160×0.045 (M1)
=7.20 EUR=7.20 EUR (A1) (C2)
[2 marks]
The first time the answer is not given to 2 decimal places the final (A1) in that part is not awarded, incorrect rounding, following correct method, can be ignored in subsequent parts.
152.80×10.8202152.80×10.8202 (M1)
Note: Follow through from their answer to part (b).
=186.30 USD=186.30 USD (A1)(ft) (C2)
Note: Follow through from part (b).
[2 marks]
Examiners report
At whatever ability, there were good attempts by all candidates on this question with an overwhelming majority scoring half marks or more. Indeed, three out of the first four marks were invariably earned with only answers of 7.27.2 EUR losing the final mark in part (b). In part (c), errors were invariably caused by candidates ignoring the commission charge or multiplying by 0.82020.8202 rather than dividing by this value. Another common, but incorrect, method seen was multiply 152.80152.80 by (1+1−0.8202)(1+1−0.8202), giving the wrong answer of 180.27180.27 USD. Both marks were lost in all the cases listed.
At whatever ability, there were good attempts by all candidates on this question with an overwhelming majority scoring half marks or more. Indeed, three out of the first four marks were invariably earned with only answers of 7.27.2 EUR losing the final mark in part (b). In part (c), errors were invariably caused by candidates ignoring the commission charge or multiplying by 0.82020.8202 rather than dividing by this value. Another common, but incorrect, method seen was multiply 152.80152.80 by (1+1−0.8202)(1+1−0.8202), giving the wrong answer of 180.27180.27 USD. Both marks were lost in all the cases listed.
At whatever ability, there were good attempts by all candidates on this question with an overwhelming majority scoring half marks or more. Indeed, three out of the first four marks were invariably earned with only answers of 7.27.2 EUR losing the final mark in part (b). In part (c), errors were invariably caused by candidates ignoring the commission charge or multiplying by 0.82020.8202 rather than dividing by this value. Another common, but incorrect, method seen was multiply 152.80152.80 by (1+1−0.8202)(1+1−0.8202), giving the wrong answer of 180.27180.27 USD. Both marks were lost in all the cases listed.