Processing math: 100%

User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2012 Marks available 1 Reference code 12N.1.sl.TZ0.5
Level SL only Paper 1 Time zone TZ0
Command term Find Question number 5 Adapted from N/A

Question

Let sin100=m. Find an expression for cos100 in terms of m.

[3]
a.

Let sin100=m . Find an expression for tan100 in terms of m.

[1]
b.

Let sin100=m. Find an expression for sin200 in terms of m.

[2]
c.

Markscheme

Note: All answers must be given in terms of m. If a candidate makes an error that means there is no m in their answer, do not award the final A1FT mark.

METHOD 1 

valid approach involving Pythagoras     (M1)

e.g. sin2x+cos2x=1 , labelled diagram 

correct working (may be on diagram)     (A1)

e.g. m2+(cos100)2=1 , 1m2

cos100=1m2    A1     N2

[3 marks]


METHOD 2

valid approach involving tan identity     (M1)

e.g. tan=sincos

correct working     (A1)

e.g. cos100=sin100tan100

cos100=mtan100     A1     N2

[3 marks]

a.

METHOD 1

tan100=m1m2 (accept m1m2)     A1     N1

[1 mark]

 

METHOD 2

tan100=mcos100     A1     N1

[1 mark]

 

b.

METHOD 1

valid approach involving double angle formula     (M1)

e.g. sin2θ=2sinθcosθ

sin200=2m1m2  (accept 2m(1m2))     A1     N2

Note: If candidates find cos100=1m2 , award full FT in parts (b) and (c), even though the values may not have appropriate signs for the angles.

[2 marks]

 

METHOD 2

valid approach involving double angle formula     (M1)

e.g. sin2θ=2sinθcosθ , 2m×mtan100

sin200=2m2tan100(=2mcos100)     A1     N2

[2 marks]

c.

Examiners report

While many candidates correctly approached the problem using Pythagoras in part (a), very few recognized that the cosine of an angle in the second quadrant is negative. Many were able to earn follow-through marks in subsequent parts of the question. A common algebraic error in part (a) was for candidates to write 1m2=1m . In part (c), many candidates failed to use the double-angle identity. Many incorrectly assumed that because sin100=m , then sin200=2m . In addition, some candidates did not seem to understand what writing an expression "in terms of m" meant.

a.

While many candidates correctly approached the problem using Pythagoras in part (a), very few recognized that the cosine of an angle in the second quadrant is negative. Many were able to earn follow-through marks in subsequent parts of the question. A common algebraic error in part (a) was for candidates to write 1m2=1m . In part (c), many candidates failed to use the double-angle identity. Many incorrectly assumed that because sin100=m , then sin200=2m . In addition, some candidates did not seem to understand what writing an expression "in terms of m" meant.

b.

While many candidates correctly approached the problem using Pythagoras in part (a), very few recognized that the cosine of an angle in the second quadrant is negative. Many were able to earn follow-through marks in subsequent parts of the question. A common algebraic error in part (a) was for candidates to write 1m2=1m . In part (c), many candidates failed to use the double-angle identity. Many incorrectly assumed that because sin100=m , then sin200=2m . In addition, some candidates did not seem to understand what writing an expression "in terms of m" meant.

c.

Syllabus sections

Topic 3 - Circular functions and trigonometry » 3.3 » Relationship between trigonometric ratios.

View options