Explain how one principle that defines the cognitive level of analysis may be demonstrated in one example of research (theory or study).

Refer to the paper 1 section A markbands on the next page when awarding marks.

The command term “explain” requires candidates to give a detailed account of how one principle that defines the cognitive level of analysis is clearly demonstrated in one relevant theory or study.

Acceptable principles include, but are not limited to:
• cognitive processes can be scientifically investigated
• cognitive processes are important mediators between stimuli and responses
• mental representations guide behaviour
• cognitive processing can be compared to computer function

After outlining the principle and giving a brief summary of one study or theory, candidates should make an explicit link between the research and the principle. If a relevant principle and research are identified but are not explicitly linked, then apply the markbands up to a maximum of [6].

If a candidate explains a principle without making reference to research, apply the markbands up to a maximum of [4].

If a candidate only describes a study or theory relevant to the cognitive level of analysis without addressing a principle at the cognitive level of analysis, apply the markbands up to a maximum of [3].

If a candidate explains more than one principle and/or uses more than one example of research, credit should be given only to the first explanation of the first principle and to the first example demonstrating that principle.