Date | November 2020 | Marks available | 3 | Reference code | 20N.3.SL.TZ0.17 |
Level | Standard level | Paper | Paper 3 | Time zone | 0 - no time zone |
Command term | Explain | Question number | 17 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
The data for the star Eta Aquilae A are given in the table.
L⊙ is the luminosity of the Sun and M⊙ is the mass of the Sun.
Show by calculation that Eta Aquilae A is not on the main sequence.
Estimate, in pc, the distance to Eta Aquilae A using the parallax angle in the table.
Estimate, in pc, the distance to Eta Aquilae A using the luminosity in the table, given that L⊙=3.83×1026 W.
Suggest why your answers to (b)(i) and (b)(ii) are different.
Eta Aquilae A is a Cepheid variable. Explain why the brightness of Eta Aquilae A varies.
Markscheme
«LL⊙=M 3.5M⊙3.5=5.703.5=» 442 ✓
the luminosity of Eta (2630L⊙) is very different «so it is not main sequence» ✓
Allow calculation of L13.5 to give M=9.5 M⊙ so not main sequence
OWTTE
d«=12.36×10-3»=424 «pc» ✓
Use of d=√L4πb ✓
=√2630×3.83×10264π×7.20×10-10 ✓
«=1.055×10193.26×9.46×1015»=342«pc» ✓
Award [3] marks for a bald correct answer between 340 and 344 «pc»
parallax angle in milliarc seconds/very small/at the limits of measurement ✓
uncertainties/error in measuring L οr b or θ ✓
values same order of magnitude, so not significantly different ✓
Accept answers where MP1 and MP2 both refer to parallax angle
OWTTE
reference to change in size ✓
reference to change in temperature ✓
reference to periodicity of the process ✓
reference to transparency / opaqueness ✓