User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2019 Marks available 15 Reference code 19N.3op4.HL.TZ0.18
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Europe) Time zone TZ0
Command term Discuss Question number 18 Adapted from N/A

Question

Section 9: France (1815–1914)

“The Dreyfus Affair destabilized the Third French Republic.” Discuss.

Markscheme

The question requires that candidates offer a considered and balanced review of the impact of the Dreyfus Affair on the Third Republic. Anti-Dreyfusards believed the strength of the state, including the reputation of the army was more important than the rights of the individual (the Dreyfusard/pro-Republican stance). Despite the public furore (families were divided, Zola’s J’Accuse…! article) it could be argued that there was little real threat to the Republic and that the instability was more apparent than real. Déroulède’s attempted coup in 1899 had little or no support even from the army and offered no alternative to the Republic. Whereas support for Dreyfus led to the various moderate and left pro-republican parties uniting and the election of 1902 returned a majority pro-republican chamber with Waldeck-Rousseau as PM indicating popular support for the Republic. Subsequently the governments of Combes and Rouvier reformed the army and separated church and state, with the Republic remaining stable. Candidates may agree, partly agree or disagree with the statement.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe » 9: France (1815–1914) » Third Republic (1871–1914): stability and crises 1871–1890—problems in establishing the Republic and Boulangisme; 1890–1914—Dreyfus, growth of political extremes, corruption
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe » 9: France (1815–1914)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe
HL options: first exams 2017

View options