Date | May 2015 | Marks available | 3 | Reference code | 15M.3dm.hl.TZ0.1 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 3 Discrete mathematics | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Calculate and Write down | Question number | 1 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
The weights of the edges of a graph HH are given in the following table.
(i) Draw the weighted graph HH.
(ii) Use Kruskal’s algorithm to find the minimum spanning tree of HH. Your solution should indicate the order in which the edges are added.
(iii) State the weight of the minimum spanning tree.
Consider the following weighted graph.
(i) Write down a solution to the Chinese postman problem for this graph.
(ii) Calculate the total weight of the solution.
(i) State the travelling salesman problem.
(ii) Explain why there is no solution to the travelling salesman problem for this graph.
Markscheme
(i) A2
Note: Award A1 if one edge is missing. Award A1 if the edge weights are not labelled.
(ii) the edges are added in the order:
FG1FG1 M1A1
CE2CE2 A1
ED3ED3
EG4EG4 A1
AC4AC4
Note: EGEG and ACAC can be added in either order.
(Reject EFEF)
(Reject CDCD)
EB5EB5 OR AB5AB5 A1
Notes: The minimum spanning tree does not have to be seen.
If only a tree is seen, the order by which edges are added must be clearly indicated.
(iii) 1919 A1
[8 marks]
(i) eg, PQRSRTSTQPPQRSRTSTQP OR PQTSTRSRQPPQTSTRSRQP M1A1
Note: Award M1 if in either (i) or (ii), it is recognised that edge PQPQ is needed twice.
(ii) total weight =34=34 A1
[3 marks]
(i) to determine a cycle where each vertex is visited once only (Hamiltonian cycle) A1
of least total weight A1
(ii) EITHER
to reach PP, QQ must be visited twice which contradicts the definition of the TSPTSP R1
OR
the graph is not a complete graph and hence there is no solution to the TSPTSP R1
[3 marks]
Total [14 marks]
Examiners report
Part (a) was generally very well answered. Most candidates were able to correctly sketch the graph of HH and apply Kruskal’s algorithm to determine the minimum spanning tree of HH. A few candidates used Prim's algorithm (which is no longer part of the syllabus).
Most candidates understood the Chinese Postman Problem in part (b) and knew to add the weight of PQPQ to the total weight of HH. Some candidates, however, did not specify a solution to the Chinese Postman Problem while other candidates missed the fact that a return to the initial vertex is required.
In part (c), many candidates had trouble succinctly stating the Travelling Salesman Problem. Many candidates used an ‘edge’ argument rather than simply stating that the Travelling Salesman Problem could not be solved because to reach vertex PP, vertex QQ had to be visited twice.