Date | November 2012 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 12N.3.HL.TZ0.20 |
Level | Higher level | Paper | Paper 3 | Time zone | Time zone 0 |
Command term | Outline | Question number | 20 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
This question is about X-rays.
Define the attenuation coefficient as applied to a beam of X-rays travelling through a medium.
Derive the relationship between the attenuation coefficient μ and the half-value thickness x12.
Aluminium is often used to filter out the low energy X-rays in a beam of X-rays. The following data are available for a particular X-ray beam.
Assuming equal initial intensities, determine, after the X-ray beam has passed through an aluminium sheet 6.0 mm thick, the following ratio.
intensityof15keVX−raysintensityof30keVX−rays
Outline why X-rays are not suitable to image an organ such as the liver.
Markscheme
the intensity of the beam I falls by a constant amount dI through each distance dx travelled such that;
dII=−μdx where μ is the attenuation coefficient;
or
I=I0e-μx where I0 is the intensity of the beam as it enters the medium;
I is the intensity after the beam has travelled a distance x in the medium and μ is the attenuation coefficient;
or
the probability per unit length;
that a photon will be absorbed;
I=I02=I0e−μx12 so e−μx12=12;
μ=ln2x12;
μ for 15keV = (ln20.7=)1.0mm−1 and μ for 30keV = (ln23.5=)0.20mm−1;
(intensityof15(keV)X−raysintensityof30(keV)X−rays)=I0e−1.0×6.0I0e−0.2×6.0;
=8.2×10-3;
Allow similar approach using half value thickness directly in the exponent, without intermediate calculation of μ, to find ratio.
Without the same rounding error this gives 8.6×10-3.
Award [3] for a bald correct answer between 8.0 and 8.6×10-3.
the attenuation coefficient of the liver and of the surrounding tissue for the X-rays have approximately the same value;
so no contrast can be obtained between liver and surrounding tissue / liver cannot be distinguished from surrounding tissue;