Date | May 2009 | Marks available | 3 | Reference code | 09M.2.hl.TZ0.1 |
Level | HL only | Paper | 2 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Find | Question number | 1 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
A machine fills containers with grass seed. Each container is supposed to weigh 28 kg. However the weights vary with a standard deviation of 0.54 kg. A random sample of 24 bags is taken to check that the mean weight is 28 kg.
Assuming the series for ex , find the first five terms of the Maclaurin series for1√2πe−x22.
(i) Use your answer to (a) to find an approximate expression for the cumulative distributive function of N(0,1) .
(ii) Hence find an approximate value for P(−0.5≤Z≤0.5) , where Z∼N(0,1) .
State and justify an appropriate test procedure giving the null and alternate hypotheses.
What is the critical region for the sample mean if the probability of a Type I error is to be 3.5%?
If the mean weight of the bags is actually 28.1 kg, what would be the probability of a Type II error?
Markscheme
ex=1+x+x22!+x33!+x44!+…
e−x22=1+(−x22)+(−x22)22!+(−x22)33!+(−x22)44!+… M1A1
1√2πe−x22=1√2π(1−x22+x48−x648+x8384) A1
[3 marks]
(i) 1√2π∫x01−t22+t48−t648+t8384dt M1
=1√2π(x−x36+x540−x7336+x93456) A1
P(Z≤x)=0.5+1√2π(x−x36+x540−x7336+x93456−…) R1A1
(ii) P(−0.5≤Z≤0.5)=2√2π(0.5−0.536+0.5540−0.57336+0.593456−…) M1
=0.38292=0.383 A1
[6 marks]
this is a two tailed test of the sample mean ¯x
we use the central limit theorem to justify assuming that R1
¯X∼N(28,0.54224) R1A1
H0:μ=28 A1
H1:μ≠28 A1
[5 marks]
since P(Type I error)=0.035 , critical value 2.108 (M1)A1
and (¯x≤28−2.108√0.54224 or ¯x≥28+2.108√0.54224 ) (M1)(A1)(A1)
¯x≤27.7676 or ¯x≥28.2324
so ¯x≤27.8 or ¯x≥28.2 A1A1
[7 marks]
if μ=28.1
¯X∼N(28.1,0.54224) R1
P(Type II error)=P(27.7676<¯x<28.2324)
=0.884 A1
Note: Depending on the degree of accuracy used for the critical region the answer for part (c) can be anywhere from 0.8146 to 0.879.
[2 marks]
Examiners report
The derivation of a series from a given one by substitution seems not to be well known. This made finding the required series from (ex) in part (a) to be much more difficult than it need have been. The fact that this part was worth only 3 marks was a clear hint that an easy derivation was possible.
In part (b)(i) the 0.5 was usually missing which meant that this part came out incorrectly.
The conditions required in part (a) were rarely stated correctly and some candidates were unable to state the hypotheses precisely. There was some confusion with "less than" and "less than or equal to".
There was some confusion with "less than" and "less than or equal to".
Levels of accuracy in the body of the question varied wildly leading to a wide range of answers to part (c).