User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2016 Marks available 1 Reference code 16M.1.hl.TZ0.6
Level HL only Paper 1 Time zone TZ0
Command term Conjecture Question number 6 Adapted from N/A

Question

Consider the recurrence relation \({H_{n + 1}} = 2{H_n} + 1,{\text{ }}n \in {\mathbb{Z}^ + }\) where \({H_1} = 1\).

Find \({H_2}\), \({H_3}\) and \({H_4}\).

[2]
a.

Conjecture a formula for \({H_n}\) in terms of \(n\), for \(n \in {\mathbb{Z}^ + }\).

[1]
b.

Prove by mathematical induction that your formula is valid for all \(n \in {\mathbb{Z}^ + }\).

[5]
c.

Markscheme

\({H_2} = 2{H_1} + 1\)    (M1)

\( = 3;{\text{ }}{H_3} = 7;{\text{ }}{H_4} = 15\)    A1

[2 marks]

a.

\({H_n} = {2^n} - 1\)    A1

[1 mark]

b.

let \({\text{P}}(n)\) be the proposition that \({H_n} = {2^n} - 1\) for \(n \in {\mathbb{Z}^ + }\)

from (a) \({H_1} = 1 = {2^1} - 1\)     A1

so \({\text{P}}(1)\) is true

assume \({\text{P}}(k)\) is true for some \(k \Rightarrow {H_k} = {2^k} - 1\)     M1

then \({H_{k + 1}} = 2{H_k} + 1\)     (M1)

\( = 2 \times ({2^k} - 1) + 1\)    A1

\( = {2^{k + 1}} - 1\)

\({\text{P}}(1)\) is true and \({\text{P}}(k)\) is true \( \Rightarrow {\text{P}}(k + 1)\) is true, hence \({\text{P}}(n)\) is true for all \(n \in {\mathbb{Z}^ + }\) by the principle of mathematical induction     R1

 

Note:     Only award the R1 if all earlier marks have been awarded.

 

[5 marks]

c.

Examiners report

This was a successful question for many candidates with many wholly correct answers seen. The vast majority of candidates were able to answer parts (a) and (b) and most knew how to start part (c). A few candidates were let down by not realising the need for a degree of formality in the presentation of the inductive proof.

a.

This was a successful question for many candidates with many wholly correct answers seen. The vast majority of candidates were able to answer parts (a) and (b) and most knew how to start part (c). A few candidates were let down by not realising the need for a degree of formality in the presentation of the inductive proof.

b.

This was a successful question for many candidates with many wholly correct answers seen. The vast majority of candidates were able to answer parts (a) and (b) and most knew how to start part (c). A few candidates were let down by not realising the need for a degree of formality in the presentation of the inductive proof.

c.

Syllabus sections

Topic 6 - Discrete mathematics » 6.11 » Recurrence relations. Initial conditions, recursive definition of a sequence.

View options