Date | May 2009 | Marks available | 1 | Reference code | 09M.2.sl.TZ2.5 |
Level | SL only | Paper | 2 | Time zone | TZ2 |
Command term | Expand | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Expand 7∑r=42r as the sum of four terms.
(i) Find the value of 30∑r=42r .
(ii) Explain why ∞∑r=42r cannot be evaluated.
Markscheme
7∑r=42r=24+25+26+27 (accept 16+32+64+128 ) A1 N1
[1 mark]
(i) METHOD 1
recognizing a GP (M1)
u1=24 , r=2 , n=27 (A1)
correct substitution into formula for sum (A1)
e.g. S27=24(227−1)2−1
S27=2147483632 A1 N4
METHOD 2
recognizing 30∑r=4=30∑r=1−3∑r=1 (M1)
recognizing GP with u1=2 , r=2 , n=30 (A1)
correct substitution into formula for sum
S30=2(230−1)2−1 (A1)
=214783646
30∑r=42r=2147483646−(2+4+8)
=2147483632 A1 N4
(ii) valid reason (e.g. infinite GP, diverging series), and r≥1 (accept r>1 ) R1R1 N2
[6 marks]
Examiners report
This question proved difficult for many candidates. A number of students seemed unfamiliar with sigma notation. Many were successful with part (a), although some listed terms or found an overall sum with no working.
The results for part (b) were much more varied. Many candidates did not realize that n was 27 and used 30 instead. Very few candidates gave a complete explanation why the infinite series could not be evaluated; candidates often claimed that the value could not be found because there were an infinite number of terms.