User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2013 Marks available 6 Reference code 13N.2.sl.14
Level SL only Paper 2 Time zone
Command term Explain Question number 14 Adapted from N/A

Question

The table shows the 21 megacities in the world in 2010 and their predicted rate of population growth between 2010 and 2025.

Rank Megacity Country % change in population 2010–2025
1 Tokyo Japan 1
2 Delhi India 29
3 São Paulo Brazil 7
4 Mumbai (Bombay) India 29
5 Mexico City Mexico 6
6 New York-Newark USA 6
7 Shanghai China 21
8 Kolkata (Calcutta) India 29
9 Dhaka Bangladesh 43
10 Karachi Pakistan 43
11 Buenos Aires Argentina 5
12 Los Angeles (including Long Beach-Santa Ana) USA 7
13 Beijing China 21
14 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 6
15 Manila Philippines 28
16 Osaka-Kobe Japan 0
17 Cairo (Al-Qahirah) Egypt 23
18 Lagos Nigeria 49
19 Moscow (Moskva) Russian Federation 1
20 Istanbul Turkey 15
21 Paris France 4

[Source: United Nations, “World Urbanization Prospects, the 2009 revision”, http://esa.un.org March 2010]

State which megacity is predicted to grow most rapidly.

[1]
a.

Describe the global distribution of the megacities listed in the table.

[3]
b.

Using examples, explain why some large urban areas have much higher population growth rates than others.

[6]
c.

“Sustainable strategies in cities can only succeed when cities have zero population growth.” Using examples, discuss this statement.

[10]
d.

Markscheme

Lagos (Nigeria).

a.

Award [1 mark] for each statement made, up to [3 marks].

A listing, with no attempt to identify any pattern or overall distribution, may not be awarded more than [1 mark].

For example:

Other valid distributional statements may be made.

b.

Population growth in large urban areas is a result of (a) net migration and (b) natural population change. As a guideline, award up to [2 marks] for comments about in-migration, [2 marks] for comments about natural increase and [2 marks] for using valid examples. This balance may be adjusted for responses which are stronger on one component than the other.

For the full [6 marks] both components of population growth should be included alongside valid examples of urban areas with different rates of population growth.

c.

Candidates are expected to have studied examples of management strategies of housing provision, pollution control and controlling in-migration. In each case they are expected to be able to take an evaluative approach. They may use any or all of these to help support their answer.

In general, population growth in cities tends to negate the positive benefits of strategies designed to improve sustainability. Sustainable strategies attempt to alter numerous aspects of a city’s system, so that, for example, energy and resource usage are reduced, waste disposal is reduced, green sources of energy are encouraged, air pollution is controlled and socially sustainable housing is readily available.

An answer which only considers sustainable strategies, for example Curitiba, without reference to population growth, should be limited to the C/D boundary.

Answers reaching band E are expected to consider how population growth tends to negate the benefits of sustainable strategies, and show some attempt at evaluation.

At band F there should be a well balanced attempt at evaluation.

Marks should be allocated according to the markbands.

d.

Examiners report

[N/A]
a.
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.
[N/A]
d.

Syllabus sections

Optional themes » Option G: Urban environments » Urban populations » Urbanization

View options