Date | May 2022 | Marks available | 22 | Reference code | 22M.Paper 2.HL.TZ0.7 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 2 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Discuss | Question number | 7 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Discuss the effectiveness of one or more health promotion programmes.
Markscheme
Refer to the paper 2 assessment criteria when awarding marks. These can be found under the “Your tests” tab > supplemental materials.
The command term “discuss” requires candidates to offer a considered review of the effectiveness of one or more health promotion programmes.
Health promotion programmes may include, but are not limited to:
- TRUTH campaign, anti-smoking campaign (Sly et al., 2002; Schum and Gold, 2007)
- National Tobacco Campaign, Australia (Woodward, 2003)
- NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme, England
- food labelling programmes
- taxes and/or subsidies upon products such as sugar, tobacco or alcohol
- stress reduction programmes such as MBSR or yoga as exercise
- public health campaigns designed to change beliefs and attitudes.
Relevant factors related to the effectiveness of health promotion may include, but are not limited to:
- effectiveness of the reduction of risk factors of target population
- use of mass media to change health behaviours
- health promotion strategies used
- primary and secondary health promotion
- characteristics of the target population
- determinants of health.
Discussion may include, but is not limited to:
- cultural considerations
- ethical considerations in programme implementation
- conditions under which the programme may be employed
- empirical evidence of programme success or failure
- methodological concerns in measuring outcomes of the programme.
Examiners report
Although few candidates attempted this question, stronger candidates formed a good discussion of health promotion programmes — how they are conducted and a clear account of factors that impact the effectiveness of these programmes. Popular choices were: TRUTH campaign, anti-smoking campaign (Sly et al., 2002; Schum and Gold, 2007); National Tobacco Campaign, Australia (Woodward, 2003); NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme, England and/or different food labelling programmes.
Weaker candidates made a more general attempt, discussing health in general and factors that lead to health/disease.