Compare and contrast the nature of the rule of two absolutist monarchs.

The question requires that candidates give an account of the similarities and differences in the rule of two absolutist monarchs; these can be contemporary absolutist monarchs from different countries, or they may choose to focus on two monarchs from a single country. When discussing the nature of their rule, areas to consider may be the extent to which these monarchs harshly treated potential critics or the extent to which they relied on the support of key institutions such as the Church to maintain their rule. There may also be reference to the extent to which the monarchs taxed their subjects in order to support extravagant lifestyles or to fund reforms. Depending on the chosen exemplars, there may be consideration of the use of the army to maintain control. Some candidates may discuss how absolutist monarchs used their power to modernize their state, for example Peter the Great, whereas others such as Louis XV did little to modernize France. There may or may not be a balance of similarities and differences. Candidates’ opinions or conclusions will be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.

The question required that candidates give an account of the similarities and differences in the rule of two absolutist monarchs.