Date | May 2019 | Marks available | 6 | Reference code | 19M.1.BP.TZ0.7 |
Level | Both SL and HL | Paper | Paper 1 - first exams 2017 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Compare and contrast | Question number | 7 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
The sources and questions relate to case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain — Key events and actors: the Granada War and the conquest of Granada (1482–1492).
Source E
Joseph O’Callaghan, a professor of medieval history, writing in the academic book The Last Crusade in the West: Castile and the Conquest of Granada (2014).
The Castilian struggle to defeat the emirate of Granada was essentially a war of religions. In making that statement I do not mean to exclude other more material motives … Kings and emirs fought over boundaries, the possession of castles and lands, and economic resources. The contrast between fertile areas in Nasrid Granada and unproductive lands in certain Castilian regions surely drew the attention of the Castilian monarchs. Access to the Mediterranean and control of the straits of Gibraltar were also attractions. Greed and the desire for riches led to border raids by both sides. Plunder [items seized] in the form of livestock, jewels, and other goods, as well as people who were to be enslaved, enriched both Christians and Muslims. All those political and economic reasons are valid and were always in play. Nevertheless, I suggest that the struggle was ultimately a conflict between two societies, one Christian, the other Muslim. Each society was shaped by the spirit of a distinctive religion.
[Source: Joseph O’Callaghan, The Last Crusade in the West: Castile and the Conquest of Granada (2014), p. 226.
Reprinted with permission of the University of Pennsylvania Press.]
Source H
Andrew Hess, a professor specializing in Islamic civilization, writing in the academic book The Forgotten Frontier: A History of the Sixteenth-Century Ibero-African Frontier (2010).
Expansion attracted to the edge of Muslim territories an aggressive and upwardly mobile [socially ambitious] element from Christian society. Everywhere there were those who wished to take the possessions of the defeated [Muslims] and acquire the prestige that would legitimize their newfound wealth and power in the presence [minds] of the older Spanish nobility. In fifteenth-century Castile the distinguishing traits [characteristics] of these frontiersmen were a warriorlike attitude towards non-Christians and a pride in the purity of their own Christian ancestry. When, like the Jews, men from the Muslim upper classes converted and somehow managed to retain their social standing and wealth, they limited the opportunities of Old Christians who wished to acquire new status and wealth … Conversely, the desertion of former Muslim leaders in an hour of need angered the members of the community they had left.
[Source: Andrew Hess, The Forgotten Frontier: A History of the Sixteenth-Century Ibero-African Frontier (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010)]
Compare and contrast what Sources E and H reveal about the Christian war against Granada.
Markscheme
Apply the markbands that provide the “best fit” to the responses given by candidates and award credit wherever it is possible to do so. The following material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required.
Comparisons:
- Both sources suggest that religion played a role in the war.
- Both sources state that there were economic motives to go to war.
Contrasts:
- Source E states that raids in search of booty enriched both sides (Christians and Muslims) whereas Source H focuses only on the benefits obtained by the Christians.
- Source E suggests that Christians and Muslims were enslaved as a consequence of the war whereas Source H considers the possibility of conversion to retain social standing and worth.
- Source E focuses on the struggle between Christian and Muslim societies whereas Source H suggests that the war led to internal rivalries between Old Christians and converted Jews and Muslims.
- Source E focuses on the attempts of rulers to bolster their wealth whereas Source H refers to the attempts of a new and ambitious class who wish to increase their own fortunes by war.
Examiners report
This question requires the comparison and contrast of two sources. Most candidates adopted the appropriate approach and were able to identify at least one comparison and/or contrast. However, there were several candidates that wrote lengthy descriptions of each source with limited direct linkage. Candidates are required to identify themes or points that can be compared/contrasted and write a running commentary rather than separate explanations of arguments given in each source. In addition, there were a number of responses that described or focused their commentary on the provenances of each source. To attain the top markband for this question, candidates need to offer more than one comparison and contrast, for example, two comparisons and two contrasts; although there need not be an equal number of each. Comparisons and contrasts should be clearly stated and the linkage points developed.