User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 9 Reference code 17M.1.BP.TZ0.8
Level Both SL and HL Paper Paper 1 - first exams 2017 Time zone TZ0
Command term Examine Question number 8 Adapted from N/A

Question

The sources and questions relate to Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain – Context and motives: Social and economic context in Iberia and Al-Andalus in the late 15th century; heavy taxation.

Source F

The Treaty of Granada (1491), signed between Abu Abdallah [Boabdil], king of Granada, and Isabella and Ferdinand, queen and king of Castile and Aragon.

Article 3. Isabella, Ferdinand, and Prince Juan [their son] will, after the surrender, accept all Granadans – from King Abu Abdallah [Boabdil] down, great and small, men and women – as their vassals and natural subjects. In return the monarchs guarantee to let them remain in their houses, estates, and to protect their inheritance now and for all time. Isabella and Ferdinand will not allow any harm to be done to the Granadans without due legal process and without cause, nor will the Granadans have their estates and property or any part thereof taken from them; furthermore, the Granadans will be honoured and respected by all Christian vassals …

Article 14. Neither Abu Abdallah nor any other Moor of Granada will have to pay taxes on their houses for three years. They will simply have to pay a harvest tax of one-tenth in August and autumn, and one–tenth on cattle in their possession in April and May, as the Christians are accustomed to paying.

The sources and questions relate to Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain – Context and motives: Social and economic context in Iberia and Al-Andalus in the late 15th century; heavy taxation.

Source G

Diego Melo Carrasco, a professor of medieval history, writing in an article “En torno al vasallaje y las parias en las treguas entre Granada y Castilla (XIII–XV): Una posibilidad de análisis” [On vassalage and parias in the truces
between Granada and Castile (13th–15th centuries): a possibility of analysis], for the academic journal Medievalismo [Medievalism] (2012).

The parias [tribute] payments always existed between the two states in recognition of the hegemony [dominance] of Castile, and they were one of the main causes of confl ict between them. For Granada, making these payments was never pleasant, since they hinted at Granada’s inferiority with respect to Castile. In addition to monetary taxation, vassalage was accompanied by commercial exchanges, the development of border institutions and constant Castilian interference in domestic affairs in Granada.

The reason for the fighting between Castile and Granada would have been, almost always, the restoration of that vassalage, especially when the Muslim ruler did not want to accept it. That is to say, war was waged to restore submission and the parias payments. For their part, the Sultans of Granada visited their Castilian overlord on various occasions, especially during the 13th and 15th centuries, to pay their respects, request truces, or simply because they were called to court to resolve political issues.

The sources and questions relate to Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain – Context and motives: Social and economic context in Iberia and Al-Andalus in the late 15th century; heavy taxation.

Source E

José Enrique López de Coca Castañer, a professor of medieval history, writing in the article “Institutions on the Castilian-Granadan Frontier” in the collection of academic essays Medieval Frontier Societies (1989).

We can distinguish between treaties where the sultan of Granada agreed to be a vassal of the king of Castile [a vassal being a person who holds land on condition of service to a ruler], and truces, which were merely suspensions of hostilities. The Nasrid dynasty had begun its historical existence as a Castilian vassal in the mid-13th century. This vassalage had been a condition of survival, but it also meant that a basic contradiction was built into the fabric of the state.

For a Muslim ruler to be a vassal of a Christian sovereign revolted [went against] every principle of Islamic law. And the vassalage of Granada was not only humiliating but a financial burden. It involved the sultan’s attendance at the Castilian court and the sending of military contingents to fight against fellow Muslims as well as Christians. Granada also had to pay large sums of money, known as parias, as an annual tribute to Castile. In order to get the money, the sultans taxed their Muslim population far more heavily than Shari’a or religious law allowed.

The sources and questions relate to Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain – Context and motives: Social and economic context in Iberia and Al-Andalus in the late 15th century; heavy taxation.

Source H

Alejandro Ferrant y Fischermans, a Spanish painter of historic and religious themes, depicts payment of parias in the 11th century in a detail from Payment of tributes to Sancho Garcés III (1865). The payment of parias by Muslim rulers to Christian rulers was a signifi cant element of their relationship until 1492.

Using the sources and your own knowledge, examine the contribution of financial issues to the fall of Granada.

Markscheme

Apply the markbands that provide the “best fit” to the responses given by candidates and award credit wherever it is possible to do so. The following material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required. While it is expected that there will be coverage of at least two of the sources, candidates are not required to refer to all four sources in their responses.

Indicative content


Source E Indicates that different pacts were signed (from truces to treaties of vassalage) that allowed the Kingdom of Granada to survive. It also suggests the role of other contributing factors in the fall of Granada, such as the demand for military contingents to fight against fellow Muslims.

Source F The source demonstrates the undermining of the kingdom of Granada as an independent state. It refers to, for example, the ongoing financial burden and the vassalage of Granadans. It also states the taxes they must pay.

Source G Mentions the conflicts arising by the payment of tributes. The source indicates that these payments led to a vassal relation between a Muslim ruler and a Christian king.

Source H Depicts the submission of Muslim rulers to Christian authorities when paying the parias and the goods delivered.

Own knowledge

Candidates may offer additional details on the system of parias and vassalage, which forced Muslims to collaborate with forces and money. These duties were onerous and, in the end, Muslim rulers had to levy new taxes on their own people. Strictly speaking, this policy was in contradiction with the Qur’an, according to which a Muslim had only to pay the zakat tax. However, Muslim states had always raised more taxes than simply the zakat. More important was the un-Islamic principle that Muslims should pay tribute to any ruler who was not a Muslim. Any rise in the amount of taxes was regarded as a policy out of the norm and the ruler, seen as unworthy. The rise in the parias was especially hard for the Granadan economy, since enemies surrounded the territory. They also faced an internal split (fitna) within the Nasrid camp: Abu al-Hasan had his capital in Malaga, while Abu Abdallah established his in Granada. The changes in the Christian context also affected Granada. The marriage between Isabella of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragon resulted in the union of two powerful kingdoms with an aim of unifying the entire Iberian Peninsula. From 1483 until the capitulation of Granada they launched several campaigns to gain fortresses, combining this with a strategy of burning and destroying the lands. In the end, the isolation of Abu Abdallah, who had no support (neither internally nor from the Marinid dynasty in North Africa), led to his capitulation.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017 » 2. Conquest and its impact » Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain » Key events and actors » The Granada War and the conquest of Granada (1482–1492)
Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017 » 2. Conquest and its impact » Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain » Key events and actors » Treaty of Granada (1491); Alhambra decree (1492)
Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017 » 2. Conquest and its impact » Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain » Key events and actors
Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017 » 2. Conquest and its impact » Case study 1: The final stages of Muslim rule in Spain
Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017 » 2. Conquest and its impact
Prescribed subjects: first exams 2017

View options