Date | November 2018 | Marks available | 4 | Reference code | 18N.1.BP.TZ0.2 |
Level | Both SL and HL | Paper | Paper 1 - first exams 2017 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Analyse | Question number | 2 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Source C
William of Newburgh, an historian, writing in the chronicle The History of English Affairs (completed c1198). Much of the chronicle was based on the writings of others.
The younger Henry, by the advice of the French, devising evil from every source against his father, went secretly into Aquitaine, where his two brothers, Richard and Geoffrey, resided with their mother; and with her connivance [plotting], brought them with him into France. Their father had granted Aquitaine to one and Brittany to the other. Hence the younger Henry believed, from the suggestions of the French, that the people of Aquitaine and Brittany would, because of Richard, support him as would the Bretons under Geoffrey. The younger Henry also allied himself to the count of Flanders—a man of great power and immoderate presumption [arrogance]. The younger Henry gained the count’s support by making great promises with the consent of the king of France [Louis VII]. Then many powerful and noble persons— in England and in foreign parts—driven by hatred, which until then they had hidden, or persuaded by promises of the vainest kind, began by degrees to desert the father for the son, and to make every preparation for war.
With reference to its origin, purpose and content, analyse the value and limitations of Source C for an historian studying the revolt of Richard I and his brothers against Henry II between 1173 and 1174.
Markscheme
Value:
- The source was written by an historian who was contextualizing the revolt as part of a chronicle.
- It is a near contemporary account of the revolt against Henry II.
- It provides information about the performance of European leaders and their alliances.
Limitations:
- It relies on the accounts of (unknown) others.
- The tone of the source is critical of the actions of the king’s sons and it may be inferred from this that the author is loyal to Henry II.
- Given the broad nature of the source (it is a book on English history), the information regarding the revolt may be limited in scope and detail.
The focus of the question is on the value and limitations of the source. If only value or limitations are discussed, award a maximum of [2]. Origins, purpose and content should be used as supporting evidence to make relevant comments on the values and limitations. For [4] there must be at least one reference to each of them in either the values or the limitations.