User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2018 Marks available 15 Reference code 18N.3op1.HL.TZ0.15
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Africa and the Middle East) Time zone TZ0
Command term To what extent Question number 15 Adapted from N/A

Question

To what extent was the partition of Africa caused by British concerns over control of the sea route to the East?

Markscheme

The question requires that candidates consider the merits or otherwise of the suggestion that the partition of Africa was, in some way, caused by British concerns over control of the sea route to the east. They may consider British concerns with safeguarding sea routes to India—the jewel in the crown of its empire—or its desire to consolidate control of South Africa, a factor which brought it into conflict with the Boer republics. Candidates may also focus on rivalry with France over Suez and the occupation of Egypt, followed by the breakdown of the gentleman’s agreement in West Africa, and British concerns over the headwaters of the Nile, which stimulated colonization in East Africa. Candidates may explore weaknesses in the strategic argument, for example by arguing the partition was already underway before 1882. They may also consider the significance of other factors, such as economic causes of the partition.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 8: European imperialism and the partition of Africa (1850–1900) » Strategic causes of the partition: the sea route to the east; British actions in Egypt and South Africa, and the responses of other European powers
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 8: European imperialism and the partition of Africa (1850–1900)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East
HL options: first exams 2017

View options