User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17N.3op1.HL.TZ0.15
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Africa and the Middle East) Time zone TZ0
Command term Evaluate Question number 15 Adapted from N/A

Question

Evaluate the impact of British actions in Egypt and South Africa on the partition of Africa.

Markscheme

The question requires that candidates make an appraisal of the impact on the partition of Africa of British actions in Egypt and South Africa. They may note that one obvious effect was the eventual colonization of those countries. In addition, British actions in Egypt led to the breakdown of the “gentleman’s agreement” with France in West Africa, while concerns over foreign control of the headwaters of the Nile led to colonial expansion in East Africa. In South Africa, candidates may note Britain’s rivalry with the Boer Republics and its expansion into the interior, which led to competition with Germany and Portugal. To provide context and/or a reference point for their evaluation, candidates may consider the impact of other factors in the partition, but the focus of the response remain on Egypt and South Africa.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 8: European imperialism and the partition of Africa (1850–1900) » Strategic causes of the partition: the sea route to the east; British actions in Egypt and South Africa, and the responses of other European powers
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 8: European imperialism and the partition of Africa (1850–1900)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East
HL options: first exams 2017

View options