User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2018 Marks available 15 Reference code 18M.3op4.HL.TZ0.35
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Europe) Time zone TZ0
Command term To what extent Question number 35 Adapted from N/A

Question

“Protests against Soviet domination in central and eastern Europe were unsuccessful up to 1980.” With reference to East Germany and Poland or Hungary and Czechoslovakia, to what extent do you agree with this statement?

Markscheme

Candidates are required to consider the merits or otherwise of the statement by identifying the aims of the various protests and the extent to which those aims were achieved. Protest movements in two states must be addressed but allow for some imbalance in their treatment. Frequently the protests were linked to living standards and the extent of direct Soviet control and repression. Whichever states are chosen, responses should address the extent of change, evidence of which may include the existence of increased trade with the west (Poland and Hungary, Czechoslovakia). However, in all cases the Communists remained the dominant party and in some cases repression increased (East Germany). Responses may well conclude that some protests led to improved living standards and/or the diminution (but not eradication) of direct Soviet control. 

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe » 18: Post-war central and eastern Europe (1945–2000) » Acceptance of, and opposition to, Soviet control in central and eastern Europe (1968–1989): East Germany; Poland; Hungary and Czechoslovakia; Romania and Bulgaria; role of Walesa and Havel
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe » 18: Post-war central and eastern Europe (1945–2000)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 4: History of Europe
HL options: first exams 2017

View options