“Philip II (Philip Augustus) was a more effective ruler than Louis VII.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Candidates are required to consider the merits or otherwise of the assessment that Philip II was a more effective ruler than his predecessor. Candidates may adopt a comparative approach or deal with each ruler sequentially. Both kings sought to reduce the power of their vassals although, and arguably, Philip was more successful in this area, with other rulers such as Henry II and the princes of Flanders paying him homage. Both were in dispute with the Angevins and again Phillip was more successful as he regained Normandy. Louis VII encouraged the construction of royal buildings such as Notre Dame and St Denis to enhance the status of the monarchy and Philip continued this process. Philip’s administrative reforms and the increasing number of royal officials extended his authority. Some may argue that Louis was distracted by his devotion to crusading from effectively ruling France.