User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17N.3op3.HL.TZ0.01
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Asia and Oceania) Time zone TZ0
Command term To what extent Question number 01 Adapted from N/A

Question

“The Silk Road was more significant for interregional trade than it was for the transmission of ideas.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Markscheme

Candidates will consider the merits or otherwise of the argument that the Silk Road was more significant for interregional trade than for the transmission of ideas. While the focus of the response must be within the timeframe of this topic, it does not need to span it, nor do the factors affecting interregional trade and the transmission of ideas need to be contemporaneous. Candidates may elect to agree or disagree with the statement or they may find some middle ground, arguing that significance varied at different times. Some candidates may suggest that significance varied per the direction of travel. They may note, for example, that the Islamic Golden Age and the 12th century Western renaissance could both be regarded a consequence of ideas that were transmitted from the East. Some candidates may also suggest that the East gained little in return.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania » 1: Trade and exchange: The Silk Road in the medieval world (750–1500) » Cultural interaction and exchange: transmission of religious ideas and art
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania » 1: Trade and exchange: The Silk Road in the medieval world (750–1500)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 3: History of Asia and Oceania
HL options: first exams 2017

View options