User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17N.3op2.HL.TZ0.11
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of the Americas) Time zone TZ0
Command term Compare and contrast Question number 11 Adapted from N/A

Question

Compare and contrast the methods used to gain independence in two Latin American countries.

Markscheme

Candidates will give an account of the similarities and differences between two independence processes within the given period referring to both processes throughout. No approach is specified. They may choose to address the comparisons and contrasts in discrete groups, or they may choose to focus on individual arguments. Candidates may compare and contrast some of the early political decisions of the independence process, resulting from events in Europe. They could compare and contrast the contributions of different social groups, of specific leaders’ initiatives and methods, and the different methods by which the independent processes were financed. Candidates might also focus on the similarities and differences of the military campaigns and the significance of the armed confrontations with Spain. While candidates may refer to some of the events leading up to the independence processes, the focus of the question should be on the processes of independence.


Note: Cuban independence is not a valid example.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas » 6: Independence movements (1763–1830) » Independence movements in the Americas: political, economic, social and religious causes; the influence of Enlightenment ideas; the role of foreign intervention; conflicts and issues leading to war
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas » 6: Independence movements (1763–1830)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas
HL options: first exams 2017

View options