User interface language: English | Español

Date November 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17N.3op1.HL.TZ0.18
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of Africa and the Middle East) Time zone TZ0
Command term Discuss Question number 18 Adapted from N/A

Question

“The conquest and destruction of the Zulu kingdom was mainly a consequence of Cetshwayo’s poor judgment.” Discuss.

Markscheme

The question requires that candidates offer a considered and balanced review of the statement that Cetshwayo’s poor judgment was the main reason for the conquest and destruction of the Zulu kingdom. Candidates may agree, partially agree, or disagree with the statement. In support of the statement, candidates may refer to Cetshwayo’s apparent inability to avoid war with the British in 1879, his decision not to attack a retreating army following victory at Isandlwana, and his failure to avert open field battle against superior arms at Ulundi. To counter this, they may argue that Britain was steadfastly determined to end the independence of a powerful African neighbour, and this meant that, in the long run, the Zulu would succumb regardless of Cetshwayo’s actions. Candidates may also argue that Cetshwayo was initially successful in his resistance to the British, especially with his victory at Isandlwana, and that much of his diplomacy with the British was characterized by moderation and astuteness.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 9: Response to European imperialism (1870–1920) » Cetshwayo and the conquest and destruction of the Zulu kingdom
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East » 9: Response to European imperialism (1870–1920)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 1: History of Africa and the Middle East
HL options: first exams 2017

View options