User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2017 Marks available 15 Reference code 17M.3op2.HL.TZ0.12
Level Higher level only Paper Paper 3 (History of the Americas) Time zone TZ0
Command term Evaluate Question number 12 Adapted from N/A

Question

Evaluate the political and military contributions of either Bolivar or San Martin to the process of independence.

Markscheme

Candidates will make an appraisal of the political and military roles of one of the two leaders by weighing up the strengths and limitations of their contributions to the independence of South America. For Bolivar, candidates may discuss the impact of his military campaigns in Nueva Granada, Venezuela, Ecuador and Peru, his success in attracting support from the British as well as many caudillos, his support for Pan-Americanism and his tendency toward authoritarianism. For San Martin, focus may be given to his military leadership of the Army of the Andes along with the formation of the mounted grenadier army and his inclusion of gauchos in his army. An assessment of his role as “protector” of Peru may be discussed as well as the controversy of his short-lived time in office.

Examiners report

[N/A]

Syllabus sections

HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas » 6: Independence movements (1763–1830) » Political, intellectual and military contributions of leaders to the process of independence: Washington, Bolivar and San Martin
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas » 6: Independence movements (1763–1830)
HL options: first exams 2017 » HL option 2: History of the Americas
HL options: first exams 2017

View options