User interface language: English | Español

Date May 2015 Marks available 4 Reference code 15M.3dm.hl.TZ0.4
Level HL only Paper Paper 3 Discrete mathematics Time zone TZ0
Command term Determine and State Question number 4 Adapted from N/A

Question

A simple connected planar graph, has ee edges, vv vertices and ff faces.

(i)     Show that 2e3f if v>22e3f if v>2.

(ii)     Hence show that K5K5, the complete graph on five vertices, is not planar.

[6]
a.

(i)     State the handshaking lemma.

(ii)     Determine the value of ff, if each vertex has degree 22.

[4]
b.

Draw an example of a simple connected planar graph on 66 vertices each of degree 33.

[2]
c.

Markscheme

(i)     METHOD 1

attempting to use f=ev+2f=ev+2 and e3v6e3v6 (if v>2v>2)     (M1)

2e6v12=6(ef+2)122e6v12=6(ef+2)12     M1A1

leading to 2e3f2e3f     AG

METHOD 2

each face is bounded by at least three edges     A1

 

Note:     Award A1 for stating e3fe3f.

 

each edge either separates two faces or, if an edge is interior to a face, it gets counted twice     R1

 

Note:     Award R1 for stating that each edge contributes two to the sum of the degrees of the faces (or equivalent) ie, deg(F)=2edeg(F)=2e.

 

adding up the edges around each face     R1

leading to 2e3f2e3f     AG

(ii)     K5K5 has e=10e=10     A1

if the graph is planar, f=7f=7     A1

this contradicts the inequality obtained above     R1

hence the graph is non-planar     AG

[6 marks]

a.

(i)     the sum of the vertex degrees =2e=2e (or is even) or equivalent     A1

(ii)     if each vertex has degree 22, then 2v=2e2v=2e     A1

substituting v=ev=e into Euler’s formula     M1

f=2f=2     A1

[4 marks]

b.

for example,

     A2

[2 marks]

Total [12 marks]

c.

Examiners report

In part (a) (i), many candidates tried to prove 2e3f2e3f with numerical examples. Only a few candidates were able to prove this inequality correctly. In part (a) (ii), most candidates knew that K5K5 has 10 edges. However, a number of candidates simply drew a diagram with any number of faces and used this particular representation as a basis for their 'proof'. Many candidates did not recognise the 'hence' requirement in part (a) (ii).

a.

In part (b) (i), many candidates stated the 'handshaking lemma' incorrectly by relating it to the 'handshake problem'. In part (b) (ii), only a few candidates determined that v=ev=e and hence found that f=2f=2.

b.

In part (c), a reasonable number of candidates were able to draw a simple connected planar graph on 66 vertices each of degree 33. The most common error here was to produce a graph that contained a multiple edge(s).

c.

Syllabus sections

Topic 10 - Option: Discrete mathematics » 10.7 » Handshaking lemma.

View options