Date | November 2009 | Marks available | 13 | Reference code | 09N.3sp.hl.TZ0.1 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 3 Statistics and probability | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Find and State | Question number | 1 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
The mean weight of a certain breed of bird is believed to be 2.5 kg. In order to test this belief, it is planned to determine the weights x1 , x2 , x3 , …, x16 (in kg) of sixteen of these birds and then to calculate the sample mean ˉx . You may assume that these weights are a random sample from a normal distribution with standard deviation 0.1 kg.
(a) State suitable hypotheses for a two-tailed test.
(b) Find the critical region for ˉx having a significance level of 5 %.
(c) Given that the mean weight of birds of this breed is actually 2.6 kg, find the probability of making a Type II error.
Markscheme
(a) H0:μ=2.5 A1
H1:μ≠2.5 A1
[2 marks]
(b) the critical values are 2.5±1.96×0.1√16 , (M1)(A1)(A1)
i.e. 2.45, 2.55 (A1)
the critical region is ˉx<2.45∪ˉx>2.55 A1A1
Note: Accept \leqslant ,{\text{ }} \geqslant .
[6 marks]
(c) {\bar X} is now {\text{N}}(2.6,{\text{ }}{0.025^2}) A1
a Type II error is accepting {H_0} when {H_1} is true (R1)
thus we require
{\text{P}}(2.45 < \bar X < 2.55) M1A1
= 0.0228\,\,\,\,\,(Accept 0.0227) A1
Note: If critical values of 2.451 and 2.549 are used, accept 0.0207.
[5 marks]
Total [13 marks]
Examiners report
In (a), some candidates incorrectly gave the hypotheses in terms of {\bar x} instead of \mu . In (b), many candidates found the correct critical values but then some gave the critical region as 2.45 < \bar x < 2.55 instead of \bar x < 2.45 \cup \bar x > 2.55 Many candidates gave the critical values correct to four significant figures and therefore were given an arithmetic penalty. In (c), many candidates correctly defined a Type II error but were unable to calculate the corresponding probability.