Date | May 2012 | Marks available | 1 | Reference code | 12M.1.hl.TZ2.10 |
Level | HL only | Paper | 1 | Time zone | TZ2 |
Command term | Sketch | Question number | 10 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
The function f is defined on the domain [0,3π2] by f(x)=e−xcosx .
State the two zeros of f .
Sketch the graph of f .
The region bounded by the graph, the x-axis and the y-axis is denoted by A and the region bounded by the graph and the x-axis is denoted by B . Show that the ratio of the area of A to the area of B is
eπ(eπ2+1)eπ+1.
Markscheme
e−xcosx=0
⇒x=π2, 3π2 A1
[1 mark]
A1
Note: Accept any form of concavity for x∈[0,π2].
Note: Do not penalize unmarked zeros if given in part (a).
Note: Zeros written on diagram can be used to allow the mark in part (a) to be awarded retrospectively.
[1 mark]
attempt at integration by parts M1
EITHER
I=∫e−xcosxdx=−e−xcosxdx−∫e−xsinxdx A1
⇒I=−e−xcosxdx−[−e−xsinx+∫e−xcosxdx] A1
⇒I=e−x2(sinx−cosx)+C A1
Note: Do not penalize absence of C.
OR
I=∫e−xcosxdx=e−xsinx+∫e−xsinxdx A1
I=e−xsinx−e−xcosx−∫e−xcosxdx A1
⇒I=e−x2(sinx−cosx)+C A1
Note: Do not penalize absence of C.
THEN
∫π20e−xcosxdx=[e−x2(sinx−cosx)]π20=e−π22+12 A1
∫3π2π2e−xcosxdx=[e−x2(sinx−cosx)]3π2π2=−e−3π22−e−π22 A1
ratio of A:B is e−π22+12e−3π22+e−π22
=e3π2(e−π2+1)e3π2(e−3π2+e−π2) M1
=eπ(eπ2+1)eπ+1 AG
[7 marks]
Examiners report
Many candidates stated the two zeros of f correctly but the graph of f was often incorrectly drawn. In (c), many candidates failed to realise that integration by parts had to be used twice here and even those who did that often made algebraic errors, usually due to the frequent changes of sign.
Many candidates stated the two zeros of f correctly but the graph of f was often incorrectly drawn. In (c), many candidates failed to realise that integration by parts had to be used twice here and even those who did that often made algebraic errors, usually due to the frequent changes of sign.
Many candidates stated the two zeros of f correctly but the graph of f was often incorrectly drawn. In (c), many candidates failed to realise that integration by parts had to be used twice here and even those who did that often made algebraic errors, usually due to the frequent changes of sign.