Date | May 2009 | Marks available | 2 | Reference code | 09M.2.SL.TZ1.4 |
Level | Standard level | Paper | Paper 2 | Time zone | Time zone 1 |
Command term | Outline | Question number | 4 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Below is a graph of atmospheric CO2 levels measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawai’i.
Explain the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration from 1960 to 2005.
Outline the precautionary principle.
Markscheme
(from 1960–2005) atmospheric CO2 concentration increases/strong positive trend / increase between 1960–2005 of 65 ppm/figures to that effect;
CO2 released by human activities contributes to the increase;
examples of human activities e.g. combustion of fossil fuels / deforestation;
seasonal/annual fluctuations (do not prevent long-term increase);
some human-induced change can be very large/perhaps catastrophic;
those responsible for the change must prove it will cause no harm before proceeding;
appropriate (environmental/medical etc.) example e.g. companies must immediately reduce emission of greenhouse gases even though proof of human impact on global warming is still debated;
is reverse of historical practice / previously those concerned about change had to prove it will do harm to prevent such changes from going ahead / paradigm shift;
Examiners report
Few candidates gained three marks. The increasing trend of atmospheric CO2 was commonly given with the combustion of fossil fuels as the reason. Sometimes, there was no explanation at all. Many candidates reported the seasonal/annual fluctuations in the trend.
It was clear that many candidates had never heard of the precautionary principle and guessed at the answer. Conversely, there were candidates who wrote terrific answers which got at the heart of the answer, i.e. that those responsible for change must prove it will cause no harm before proceeding. Good examples were limited.