Date | May 2021 | Marks available | 22 | Reference code | 21M.Paper 2.HL.TZ0.12 |
Level | HL only | Paper | Paper 2 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Discuss | Question number | 12 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Discuss one or more factors influencing by-standerism.
Markscheme
Refer to the paper 2 assessment criteria when awarding marks. These can be found under the “Your tests” tab > supplemental materials.
The command term “discuss” requires candidates to offer a considered review of one or more factors influencing by-standerism.
Factors influencing by-standerism may include, but are not limited to:
- diffusion of responsibility
- normative social influence (conformity)
- cultural considerations
- costs/rewards of helping behaviour
- dispositional characteristics.
Relevant studies may include, but are not limited to:
- Latane and Darley’s (1970; 1968) studies of unresponsive by-stander
- Bateson and Darley’s (1973) study on the role of situational and dispositional factors
- Piliavin’s (1969) study of helping behavior and the costs/rewards of helping
- Oliner and Oliner’s (1988) study of dispositional factors in by-standerism.
Critical discussion may include, but is not limited to:
- methodological and ethical considerations in the research on by-standerism
- how the findings of research have been interpreted and applied
- implications of the findings
- assumptions and biases
- areas of uncertainty
- comparison with alternative factors.
Examiners report
This was also a popular question. Overall, responses reflected that candidates understood by-standerism and the classic studies that illustrate the concept. Most who attempted this question did fairly well.
In the majority of cases, reasons for by-standerism were identified, though not always fully explained/described. Weaker responses tended to focus more on presenting relevant studies. In addition, evaluation tended to be more of the strengths and weaknesses of the studies, rather than focusing on by-standerism per se.