Date | November 2019 | Marks available | 22 | Reference code | 19N.Paper 2.BP.TZ0.10 |
Level | SL and HL | Paper | Paper 2 | Time zone | TZ0 |
Command term | Discuss | Question number | 10 | Adapted from | N/A |
Question
Discuss one or more research methods used in the study of personal relationships.
Markscheme
Refer to the paper 2 assessment criteria when awarding marks. These can be found under the “Your tests” tab > supplemental materials.
The command term “discuss” requires candidates to offer a considered review of research methods used in the study of personal relationships.
Relevant research methods could include, but are not limited to:
- interviews (eg focus group, semi-structured)
- naturalistic observations
- correlational studies (eg surveys)
- case study
- experiments.
Examples of studies that may be used could include:
- Flora and Segrin’s (2003) study, using interviews, of the relational history in married and dating couples
- Gupta and Singh’s (1982) study interviewing couples in love relationships and arranged marriages
- Glenn’s (2005) study using interviews and questionnaires to investigate cultural grounding of personal relationships
- Gatter and Hodkinson’s (2016) study of Tinder versus online dating agencies, using correlational design with a convenience sample and snowball sampling
- Levenson and Gottman’s (1983) observational study of marital dissatisfaction.
Discussion points may include, but are not limited to:
- demand characteristics/social desirability effect in self-reported studies
- experimental research may lack ecological validity
- issues and problems related to gender and cross-cultural differences
- sampling bias
- validity and reliability
- ethical considerations.
Examiners report
[N/A]